Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 00:03:07 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 10/29] kgbd: Pretend that console list walk is safe
Message-ID: <YyHtKwzMH4yblJrD@google.com>
References: <20220910221947.171557773@linutronix.de>
 <20220910222300.966724916@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220910222300.966724916@linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On (22/09/11 00:27), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Provide a special list iterator macro for KGDB to allow unprotected list
> walks and add a few comments to explain the hope based approach.
> 
> Preperatory change for changing the console list to hlist and adding
> lockdep asserts to regular list walks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>

[..]
> -	for_each_console(c) {
> +	/*
> +	 * This is a completely unprotected list walk designed by the
> +	 * wishful thinking departement. See the oops_inprogress comment

s/oops_inprogress/oops_in_progress/