Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:06:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:05:46 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:37138 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:05:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:03:38 +0000 From: Russell King To: Jamie Lokier Cc: David Woodhouse , Christoph Rohland , Alan Cox , Maciej Zenczykowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] Wrapping memory. Message-ID: <20011204210338.C19783@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <12969.1007315617@redhat.com> <25163.1007370678@redhat.com> <20011204104047.A18147@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20011204163950.B28839@kushida.jlokier.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011204163950.B28839@kushida.jlokier.co.uk>; from lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:39:50PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 04:39:50PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Unfortunately, the update_mmu_cache makes aliasing work properly while > ruining performence, so then it's better to not to use the mapping trick > at all in that case. To check for this, I have to call gettimeofday() > between pairs of accesses, to check whether they are slow. I don't know > for sure if this works because I don't have an ARM to try it on. Why not create a program and email it to someone with an ARM machine? -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/