Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:06:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:05:44 -0500 Received: from [206.98.161.198] ([206.98.161.198]:9231 "EHLO bart.learningpatterns.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:05:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 From: Edward Muller To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.2 (Preview Release) Date: 04 Dec 2001 16:03:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1007499797.4520.11.camel@akira.learningpatterns.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 15:20, Alan Cox wrote: > > > So anyone perfectly happy with an older distro that didn't > > > ship python2-and-whatever-else gets screwed when they want to > > > build a newer kernel. Nice. > > > > That's been the case all along, sans python2. Newer kernels need newer > > tools. That's always been the case. > > Not during stable releases. In fact we've jumped through hoops several times > to try and keep egcs built kernels working Agreed. I spoke a little too broadly. But newer 'trees' (2.0 to 2.2 to 2.4 to 2.5) has always (IIRC) needed newer tools. -- ------------------------------- Edward Muller Director of IS 973-715-0230 (cell) 212-487-9064 x115 (NYC) http://www.learningpatterns.com ------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/