Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:22:47 +0200
From:   Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller
Message-ID: <20220915112247.fin7bb45plnr7cme@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
References: <20220909145942.844102-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
 <CACRpkdYWP4ASoO4wWSEgdCPbNLsx8fuHn_-oqnD+ff1TU84ieQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYWP4ASoO4wWSEgdCPbNLsx8fuHn_-oqnD+ff1TU84ieQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

The 09/14/2022 15:02, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:55 PM Horatiu Vultur
> <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> wrote:
> 
> > Fixes: be36abb71d878f ("pinctrl: ocelot: add support for interrupt controller")
> > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> 
> This v3 patch applied for fixes so we get some rotation in linux-next
> and get the Ocelot kernel in working order.
> Should it even be tagged for stable?

Thanks for applying the patch!

It would be great to go also in stable. I have tried to apply it on
5.19, 5.15, 5.10, 5.4, 4.19 but it failed on all of them because of
merge conflicts.
Should I send separate patch for each stable tree?

> 
> Andy had some further things to think about, consider these
> for possible further patching.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

-- 
/Horatiu