Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283379AbRLDVZA>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:25:00 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S283388AbRLDVYn>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:24:43 -0500
Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:30123 "EHLO
	mailout04.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S283469AbRLDVYS>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:24:18 -0500
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 22:24:07 +0100
From: Gert Menke <gert@menke.za.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kapm-idled
Message-ID: <20011204222407.D1772@mouse.mydomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112042145290.23155-100000@Appserv.suse.de>; from davej@suse.de on Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:45:44PM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:45:44PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s14-1
Sorry, I should have read the FAQ first.

But it is still annoying that kapm-idled claims to use that much system
ressources when it isn't. When my system is idle it should say ~100% idle,
not ~50% system. Right?
Is there an easy way to fix this? Or a good reason not to?

Greetings
Gert
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/