Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2022 11:40:35 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     yong w <yongw.pur@gmail.com>
Cc:     jaewon31.kim@samsung.com, mhocko@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        wang.yong12@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark
 fast
Message-ID: <YyREk5hHs2F0eWiE@kroah.com>
References: <ab879545-d4b2-0cd8-3ae2-65f9f2baf2fe@gmail.com>
 <YyCLm0ws8qsiEcaJ@kroah.com>
 <CAOH5QeAUGBshLQdRCWLg9-Q3JvrqROLYW6uWr8a4TBKxwAOPaw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAOH5QeAUGBshLQdRCWLg9-Q3JvrqROLYW6uWr8a4TBKxwAOPaw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 08:46:15AM +0800, yong w wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> 于2022年9月13日周二 21:54写道：
> 
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 09:09:47PM +0800, yong wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > This patch is required to be patched in linux-5.4.y and linux-4.19.y.
> >
> > What is "this patch"?  There is no context here :(
> >
> Sorry, I forgot to quote the original patch. the patch is as follows
> 
>     f27ce0e page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast
> 
> > > In addition to that, the following two patches are somewhat related:
> > >
> > >       3334a45 mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx
> > >       9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative value
> >
> > In what way?  What should be done here by us?
> >
> 
> I think these two patches should also be merged.
> 
>     The classzone_idx  parameter is used in the zone_watermark_fast
> functionzone, and 3334a45 use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx.
>     "9282012 page_alloc: fix invalid watermark check on a negative
> value"  fix f27ce0e introduced issues

Ok, I need an ack by all the developers involved in those commits, as
well as the subsystem maintainer so that I know it's ok to take them.

Can you provide a series of backported and tested patches so that they
are easy to review?

thanks,

greg k-h