Received: by 2002:a05:6358:489b:b0:bb:da1:e618 with SMTP id x27csp142788rwn; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:09:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4aNEfSud1R5xnuZO1MEmNMOZu0o3t3XQHqLpg05Mi3KWNCGPu5InrwDzGtR38sLWN8+3yA X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d384:b0:178:60a9:8f19 with SMTP id e4-20020a170902d38400b0017860a98f19mr2205999pld.141.1663373361836; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:09:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663373361; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vUg+IvEfd3LCgQFOuan8N/eHg7FcLrep63MHcvaJxYsCWyh2IWEFs9MJTY/S0yW1n6 0XL9+kVVB8Y5sWqZFeqE3G/Pl+pa/NpKkI1OdoGgidooBGBkKYwtt+RDU+RrixYetMaw GyJ7g9DKtQ68b17sH/F0BK1STu4WAirV+Ilf8AQ/itdBjfJRqvtyFt2GuMeyRP5yXI2U VXHlvbg5c3kJeBnAjgUakqIjgDq35aESuM54QHD3ac0P23s2NxyJmteoVUZTd3Xlzymo xT9KMcDAKCvvGXT8rYu07AKBRlGJBzPz0yovzIk+W+ZIOgWxyJhJCwN36MdwuTACNFdr 9puQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=50pfUUj/vgJFWVGyCmPh4h7BWyWJzM6r5aZUYPBRoMw=; b=Pvu2J8mzPtlaGSZWVL0soL5C1lVuuH55kNdydp/5h8uekGL+fJTEff0ME4wgmwBt1w fXz1ex88B6dYiumMoXFvrSPN/sL/y2UERiiQ/GZnogBFpqIYDEDluOj9b772Q5ZVVi5w BuQ8m0QDOT82uhOff/8gQdO4nqcEKEQItCBFmFBDfPZ8b+kue6sK+0C/FkKaM5aRhwp2 iDrxkDs7ueyjvw/JQoq2di1modRN2zfMVojreG2cQ2HnM7E0rv1LYkC7REnXmEpFKL2U xFPUJGv0bVk5zoi7tgTvD2xbitskM2KKHQkXVlQsk3AsK5ovGrqcBBdFlmK7F7UB2B1Z Qdcg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gX6FWj46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l64-20020a638843000000b004394176729esi13686207pgd.208.2022.09.16.17.09.09; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=gX6FWj46; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229790AbiIQACa (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 20:02:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50864 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229685AbiIQAC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 20:02:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BACEAB046; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id kr11so6710193ejc.8; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:02:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=50pfUUj/vgJFWVGyCmPh4h7BWyWJzM6r5aZUYPBRoMw=; b=gX6FWj46IiYEMBWFzAQpW/X9rgfemENCTEGH7qioDntvtkqCifz2ld/bbtzLYyLn3d 4PCLXtTYhHukcC4tIj6BY/X530N2+lkUJ+okA7NcKCX4ObLu+N+Fj3WoYKgikvDAsS1T 1oIj+JeU1LsBntvA8oagnJAIbaueJXMu/m1AGzpqky1gsc1FWWBeFuMjr3Z4icUbQSNR twRd+k0a4mhqI2YPBVpmQOE9UwxUSUlSpE5OHqgksyIt8xMvlrNSxFWGBVKe2DDelfvA vIPcBaawr1vY/GtU9yI9rqIGPKtdNBVM9LV/QT05IdQt970IzFj5EVLUanspwkSOAIhU 2ykA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=50pfUUj/vgJFWVGyCmPh4h7BWyWJzM6r5aZUYPBRoMw=; b=B8yXqu7+X9A5nwKtY6kFHOHb+6YzrsIqD9FSYIR7sae6FmfsxAi4HJbvjScIT/ZKQX /Tjx/9/vbTrz7VK/UqGMii/HiQl37UJg+sspKIEn0WQdlfyt86g/ZdGGK9Elsg/YkXjO VQgFzFxjBwc59cdvNWD+1dvGsFMmy9/BXjx0ASIZB7xY+bkBF8l76crpgdgHCZ3AD9un a2Yh1khSro5IAmzdgIXzGDawLlXIxAyB5NYFznoqPdKP0vHAV6mvYN9n7/oymtbj8LWm A2/ipr89ByU0d8eN0De1xx2ndIDUub5DmBjOGmUEH/hktHoC4z9hbDQ3hZHRLMI0P0DH n8Vw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2HpOFFQRdqf4zmyjLCNHtAz2U+RGI15mvY3+ol5MNFCz3MBroE KuFTf5bUAkR/MUG1x1yp8vSOtMHip0vLHV76XNs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:ea0:b0:779:6c9d:7355 with SMTP id ho32-20020a1709070ea000b007796c9d7355mr4956271ejc.542.1663372945402; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:02:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220909041645.2612842-1-floridsleeves@gmail.com> <4ff0b209-2770-3790-ae93-3ea81c15a03e@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4ff0b209-2770-3790-ae93-3ea81c15a03e@intel.com> From: Li Zhong Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:02:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100: check the return value of e100_exec_cmd() To: Tony Nguyen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 3:08 PM Tony Nguyen wrote: > > On 9/8/2022 9:16 PM, Li Zhong wrote: > > Check the return value of e100_exec_cmd() which could return error code > > when execution fails. > > Are you coming across this as a real bug or as something reported by > static analysis? If the latter, I suggest checking the return value and > reporting it as debug, however, not changing existing behavior. We don't > have validation on this driver so there is limited ability to check for > regressions and the code has been like this for a long time without > reported issues. Thanks for replying and suggestions! This is detected by static analysis. I submit a v2 patch that fixes it as debug printk. > > Thanks, > Tony > > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c > > index 11a884aa5082..3b84745376fe 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c > > @@ -1911,7 +1911,8 @@ static inline void e100_start_receiver(struct nic *nic, struct rx *rx) > > > > /* (Re)start RU if suspended or idle and RFA is non-NULL */ > > if (rx->skb) { > > - e100_exec_cmd(nic, ruc_start, rx->dma_addr); > > + if (!e100_exec_cmd(nic, ruc_start, rx->dma_addr)) > > + return; > > nic->ru_running = RU_RUNNING; > > } > > }