Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp294032rwb; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4149cKGgXsTZjaIDlMx+biKZhKV3hjPYlv+kexshbiD8Y939C4TSJCGRR5agicniwK6UkO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4511:b0:43b:a182:8a0a with SMTP id ez17-20020a056402451100b0043ba1828a0amr7636106edb.410.1663417865313; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663417865; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dHp+26kSb2OGnY9pvhAPw01h+l88SW2JyZPr2o+4nSAL71iKsZykb7odukcjekFU+s OwMMbZLa55Qq/Y6cstciI1eVLRHshEk8EIN8JV+FvTBaeVfpPNHF3GbysrtiYrb0ZXbi ocTmIWmBZumx8PcSvhdAmJNefR/HbZTipKHjpAsMrasrwUnUOMxAFMqkDlua9V1rFG2O YRB5lhHVrOLXFvyk8SsFaSa2tMrF80XnpRyH+tdzwCLzSVjEhB/hShAvOaar4MYfF7Nn 8Ld0FTcWTT3g80zK+jCJ5Z4OSf++GR88RdcuEgeQureX0942RpXFbme1PcBOQCF9929H neXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=StRWvOMIyKnaGDlnw67u6kkTmsmKMYm2RSmroaMt6N0=; b=0MG/9How3bGrbW/jOe6CrAW1ybKRqfBttmPN+QZTaj6MIp3aDaCju46BoGRPfGA4v5 xKKD+q55XjAR9cJ3jQSNqpqYXlNuArprRge6gznZ2qpAW96VN/pdD7d8Sv6rA9+SBKOo 3EfH6or0lfv+q/5o1q8HB/rNsPJ4/77tcsG1T0d7r1kckiplDCtHVBo222zQ+v5Why8Z kvqUs74k3Bcq64RtHAdqYJI2+7J3wSGruB1pOxF/V+xn4nHnDo6MYu6REzBNJMKLoNWq KAO5Z7k5D8bBs2o3rNzJ65cjG3+LGCXlerctt4uG3UBOCkIk76HzcRnN/+Mc5JAjKyVE mUJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k26-20020aa7d8da000000b0043be542b956si3992503eds.262.2022.09.17.05.30.39; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 05:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229538AbiIQMEC (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 08:04:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229685AbiIQMDm (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Sep 2022 08:03:42 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [IPv6:2001:4190:8020::34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342833AB26; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 05:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6F3F692009C; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 14:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6858C92009B; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 13:03:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 13:03:38 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Bjorn Helgaas cc: Stefan Roese , Jim Wilson , David Abdurachmanov , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] PCI: Work around PCIe link training failures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Attempt to handle cases such as with a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 PCIe switch where link training never completes and the link continues switching between speeds indefinitely with the data link layer never reaching the active state. It has been observed with a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 Gen 3 switch wired to the upstream port of the Pericom PI7C9X2G304 Gen 2 switch, using a Delock Riser Card PCI Express x1 > 2 x PCIe x1 device, P/N 41433, wired to a SiFive HiFive Unmatched board. In this setup the switches are supposed to negotiate the link speed of preferably 5.0GT/s, falling back to 2.5GT/s. Instead the link continues oscillating between the two speeds, at the rate of 34-35 times per second, with link training reported repeatedly active ~84% of the time. Forcibly limiting the target link speed to 2.5GT/s with the upstream ASM2824 device however makes the two switches communicate correctly. Removing the speed restriction afterwards makes the two devices switch to 5.0GT/s then. Make use of these observations then and detect the inability to train the link, by checking for the Data Link Layer Link Active status bit being off while the Link Bandwidth Management Status indicating that hardware has changed the link speed or width in an attempt to correct unreliable link operation. Restrict the speed to 2.5GT/s then with the Target Link Speed field, request a retrain and wait 200ms for the data link to go up. If this turns out successful, then lift the restriction, letting the devices negotiate a higher speed. Also check for a 2.5GT/s speed restriction the firmware may have already arranged and lift it too with ports of devices known to continue working afterwards, currently the ASM2824 only, that already report their data link being up. Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203022037020.56670@angie.orcam.me.uk/ Link: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/a398a51ccc68 --- Changes from v4: - Remove inclusion no longer needed. - Make the quirk generic based on probing device features rather than specific to the ASM2824 part only; take the Retrain Link bit erratum into account. - Still lift the 2.5GT/s speed restriction with the ASM2824 only. - Increase retrain timeout from 200ms to 1s (PCIE_LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT). - Remove retrain success notification. - Use PCIe helpers rather than generic PCI functions throughout. - Trim down and update the wording of the change description for the switch from an ASM2824-specific to a generic fixup. Changes from v3: - Remove the entry for the ASM2824. Changes from v2: - Regenerate for 5.17-rc2 for a merge conflict. - Replace BUG_ON for a missing PCI Express capability with WARN_ON and an early return. Changes from v1: - Regenerate for a merge conflict. --- drivers/pci/quirks.c | 118 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+) linux-pcie-asm2824-manual-retrain.diff Index: linux-macro/drivers/pci/quirks.c =================================================================== --- linux-macro.orig/drivers/pci/quirks.c +++ linux-macro/drivers/pci/quirks.c @@ -5956,3 +5956,121 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_I DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x56c0, aspm_l1_acceptable_latency); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x56c1, aspm_l1_acceptable_latency); #endif + +/* + * Retrain the link of a downstream PCIe port by hand if necessary. + * + * This is needed at least where a downstream port of the ASMedia ASM2824 + * Gen 3 switch is wired to the upstream port of the Pericom PI7C9X2G304 + * Gen 2 switch, and observed with the Delock Riser Card PCI Express x1 > + * 2 x PCIe x1 device, P/N 41433, plugged into the SiFive HiFive Unmatched + * board. + * + * In such a configuration the switches are supposed to negotiate the link + * speed of preferably 5.0GT/s, falling back to 2.5GT/s. However the link + * continues switching between the two speeds indefinitely and the data + * link layer never reaches the active state, with link training reported + * repeatedly active ~84% of the time. Forcing the target link speed to + * 2.5GT/s with the upstream ASM2824 device makes the two switches talk to + * each other correctly however. And more interestingly retraining with a + * higher target link speed afterwards lets the two successfully negotiate + * 5.0GT/s. + * + * With the ASM2824 we can rely on the otherwise optional Data Link Layer + * Link Active status bit and in the failed link training scenario it will + * be off along with the Link Bandwidth Management Status indicating that + * hardware has changed the link speed or width in an attempt to correct + * unreliable link operation. For a port that has been left unconnected + * both bits will be clear. So use this information to detect the problem + * rather than polling the Link Training bit and watching out for flips or + * at least the active status. + * + * Since the exact nature of the problem isn't known and in principle this + * could trigger where an ASM2824 device is downstream rather upstream, + * apply this erratum workaround to any downstream ports as long as they + * support Link Active reporting and have the Link Control 2 register. + * Restrict the speed to 2.5GT/s then with the Target Link Speed field, + * request a retrain and wait 200ms for the data link to go up. + * + * If this turns out successful and we know by the Vendor:Device ID it is + * safe to do so, then lift the restriction, letting the devices negotiate + * a higher speed. Also check for a similar 2.5GT/s speed restriction the + * firmware may have already arranged and lift it with ports that already + * report their data link being up. + */ +static void pcie_downstream_link_retrain(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + static const struct pci_device_id ids[] = { + { PCI_VDEVICE(ASMEDIA, 0x2824) }, /* ASMedia ASM2824 */ + {} + }; + u16 lnksta, lnkctl2; + u32 lnkcap; + + if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) || !pcie_downstream_port(dev) + || !pcie_cap_has_lnkctl2(dev)) + return; + + /* It's too early yet to use `dev->link_active_reporting'. */ + pcie_capability_read_dword(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &lnkcap); + if (!(lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC)) + return; + + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, &lnkctl2); + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta); + if ((lnksta & (PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS | PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)) == + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS) { + unsigned long timeout; + u16 lnkctl; + + pci_info(dev, "broken device, retraining non-functional downstream link at 2.5GT/s\n"); + + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl); + lnkctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL; + lnkctl2 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS; + lnkctl2 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_2_5GT; + pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, lnkctl2); + pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnkctl); + /* + * Due to an erratum in some devices the Retrain Link bit + * needs to be cleared again manually to allow the link + * training to succeed. + */ + lnkctl &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL; + if (dev->clear_retrain_link) + pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, + lnkctl); + + timeout = jiffies + PCIE_LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT; + do { + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, + &lnksta); + if (lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA) + break; + usleep_range(10000, 20000); + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)); + + if (!(lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)) { + pci_info(dev, "retraining failed\n"); + return; + } + } + + if ((lnksta & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA) && + (lnkctl2 & PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS) == PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS_2_5GT && + pci_match_id(ids, dev)) { + u16 lnkctl; + + pci_info(dev, "removing 2.5GT/s downstream link speed restriction\n"); + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, &lnkctl); + lnkctl |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL; + lnkctl2 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2_TLS; + lnkctl2 |= lnkcap & PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS; + pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2, lnkctl2); + pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, lnkctl); + } +} +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, + pcie_downstream_link_retrain); +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME_EARLY(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, + pcie_downstream_link_retrain);