Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 17 Sep 2022 15:29:08 +0100
From:   "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/38] 5.19.10-rc1 review
Message-ID: <YyXZtKyLqiay31Ko@debian>
References: <20220916100448.431016349@linuxfoundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220916100448.431016349@linuxfoundation.org>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:08:34PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.10 release.
> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 18 Sep 2022 10:04:31 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220819):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1846
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1849
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1851

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

--
Regards
Sudip