Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283571AbRLDWSx>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:18:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S283540AbRLDWSr>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:18:47 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:44552 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S283566AbRLDWR6>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:17:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
To: trevorlsmith@home.com (Trevor Smith)
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 22:26:13 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: emuller@learningpatterns.com (Edward Muller),
        alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), davej@suse.de (Dave Jones),
        esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        hch@caldera.de (Christoph Hellwig), kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens),
        kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, torvalds@transmeta.com
In-Reply-To: <007801c17d10$8a21bc60$0a49a8c0@dagate.trevor> from "Trevor Smith" at Dec 04, 2001 02:10:04 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16BO0z-0003jY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Are we not talking about the 2.5 kernel build tree? My understanding of the
> numbering of kernels is that the 2.4.x tree is stable; and the 2.5.x tree is
> the new development tree

Erik is talking about crapping in both trees, as opposed to 2.5 only
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/