Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220909145942.844102-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
 <CACRpkdYWP4ASoO4wWSEgdCPbNLsx8fuHn_-oqnD+ff1TU84ieQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220915112247.fin7bb45plnr7cme@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20220915112247.fin7bb45plnr7cme@soft-dev3-1.localhost>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 18 Sep 2022 20:55:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdasNECTqew4=5mNK8SRd8SiLFw=BwMKBGoNhu=8A7jJZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 1:18 PM Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> wrote:

> It would be great to go also in stable. I have tried to apply it on
> 5.19, 5.15, 5.10, 5.4, 4.19 but it failed on all of them because of
> merge conflicts.
> Should I send separate patch for each stable tree?

You should indicate to the stable maintainers that it should go into
stable (option 2), then prepare backports IIUC. See:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0-rc5/process/stable-kernel-rules.html

Yours,
Linus Walleij