Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 14:26:44 +0300
From:   Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To:     Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= 
        <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Cc:     Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        "Yadav, Arvind" <arvyadav@amd.com>,
        Arvind Yadav <Arvind.Yadav@amd.com>, andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com,
        shashank.sharma@amd.com, amaranath.somalapuram@amd.com,
        Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
        gustavo@padovan.org, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
        linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] dma-buf: Check status of
 enable-signaling bit on debug
Message-ID: <YyhR9OGjWVwm31Rp@intel.com>
References: <20220914164321.2156-1-Arvind.Yadav@amd.com>
 <d2d81ffd-2269-bdc6-0daa-8f3a99306e46@amd.com>
 <33a16b15-3d3c-7485-d021-ee2a727e5391@amd.com>
 <691c421f-1297-cd08-ea70-6750099275b1@amd.com>
 <YyVmYXGCfTuYUsNb@intel.com>
 <c958d871-9a89-3490-f5e3-3a2441926074@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c958d871-9a89-3490-f5e3-3a2441926074@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 05:18:40PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 17.09.22 um 08:17 schrieb Ville Syrj?l?:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:05:30PM +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> >> Am 15.09.22 um 15:02 schrieb Yadav, Arvind:
> >>> On 9/15/2022 5:37 PM, Christian K?nig wrote:
> >>>> Is that sufficient to allow running a desktop on amdgpu with the
> >>>> extra check enabled? If yes that would be quite a milestone.
> >>>>
> >>> Yes, It is running on amdgpu with extra config enabled.
> >> In this case I will start pushing the patches to drm-misc-next. I'm just
> >> going to leave out the last one until the IGT tests are working as well.
> > ffs Christian. intel CI blew up yet again:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12146/shard-glk7/igt@kms_plane_lowres@tiling-y@pipe-c-hdmi-a-2.html
> >
> > The last time (some ttm thing) was just a week or two ago,
> > so it's really getting tiresome watching you push entirely
> > untested stuff all the time. Would be really helpful if you
> > finally started to do/require premerge testing.
> 
> Well first of all sorry for causing trouble, but as I wrote above I 
> intentionally left out the last one to *not* break the IGT tests.
> 
> The patches pushed so far where just updating a bunch of corner cases 
> and fixing the selftests.
> 
> Do you have any more insight why that should affect the IGT tests?

I have no idea. You have the oopses from pstore right there.
Did you even look at them?

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel