Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp2721955rwb; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:02:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7XKRzX8mZm7tJ/XYZSK6ksLAaNvR7iSxklok86nqncXUt8oIuryhgRhDF5NU5YvPaMraen X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f12:0:b0:438:fa5b:ff76 with SMTP id f18-20020a631f12000000b00438fa5bff76mr16405917pgf.390.1663603351947; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663603351; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AkczED/Q96+WZVlzaeXWiYrqv+cgNfbb+q9/jvVTUkvpMCmaHGZF3eV3Fs62uUbyhx OcHs6uuYwcmZos3kCjAd6jFUtkKHXcLpX67KPeHlKAUZjz1oJpfPLqy12SJVsVTemk39 CNeFJ1bPXf0pd8BdZmGeOwae82Gz665xAribQif8SVoPaceYTtDdgNbUQqboEjPOymQ3 BkNYIS5SeGn/I9gW9eVlgzjIOs7aOD5QKnoQLaXeZOwKF3UfIkxDOL4T+0HKfdMcV/Q4 GN9DviDYWiaIzqnTiTLtzWxBWT4c3Z7sSrp3aaDpI7Rh50i6FzQJmo+AGoku2iHBQWOZ QiSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=cRvDDL6o+kQo+DYmreaVl8Us8UvZ6KuLq97OAzpIqv0=; b=Pl6/l+oGkDWSNF9HcFpBf4EkZgoghv7wr4OxXDa58t8l9AKGhZeEVWOctLJ4wOxq21 KY51Tx/KuclrugSqNg9HMgid8YgqCr0S5j32CbHYZK18S8TSsrRNdPG5Ri/RuehUBsVS Mo5BWgF/+itRKtMT7L5tR9sOC2Ymf36hXknTrRyd5Jn2Nu68mxAXIOGbTjoNPHnRd9Bk e2AXMguC8ly3ILtaefHo6zzmMPxs00Y9S006oBzLnkUnH7S/VB3N+/G9KfTR6ADOeW1X ZvhcQKPsjEt5cjh7TCsfJPtnqrRp8+OrULJNmpWGzKcSFgD1624zK0qawdo7jNofkKwl R+jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r3-20020a635d03000000b0043a56cc100dsi31365pgb.593.2022.09.19.09.02.18; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230254AbiISPqx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:46:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34134 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229910AbiISPqu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 11:46:50 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C70F11C3F; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:51230) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oaIyt-000hY1-Nw; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:46:47 -0600 Received: from ip68-110-29-46.om.om.cox.net ([68.110.29.46]:34848 helo=email.froward.int.ebiederm.org.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1oaIys-007k7X-Mh; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 09:46:47 -0600 From: "Eric W. Biederman" To: Tycho Andersen Cc: Al Viro , Oleg Nesterov , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220728091220.GA11207@redhat.com> <87pmhofr1q.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87v8rfevz3.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <87h72zes14.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> <20220729204730.GA3625@redhat.com> <875yjfdw3a.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:46:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Tycho Andersen's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2022 07:59:08 -0600") Message-ID: <87wn9z1i5b.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1oaIys-007k7X-Mh;;;mid=<87wn9z1i5b.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.110.29.46;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=softfail X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18PIokmn08vX/hBB3WTU24vRT4rnbzUX9U= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.110.29.46 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa05 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ****;Tycho Andersen X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 503 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (2.5%), b_tie_ro: 11 (2.2%), parse: 1.22 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 15 (2.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.06 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 19 (3.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.54 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.17 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 137 (27.3%), check_bayes: 135 (26.9%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 2.0 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 118 (23.4%), b_finish: 1.10 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 298 (59.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.71 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (0.6%), poll_dns_idle: 0.61 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 4.4 (0.9%), tests_pri_500: 9 (1.8%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] fuse: In fuse_flush only wait if someone wants the return code X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tycho Andersen writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 12:10:33AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Al, vfs folks? (igrab/iput sorted so as not to be distractions). > > Any movement on this? Can you resend (or I can) the patch with the > fixes for fuse at the very least? Sorry for not replying earlier. Thank you for taking this. I had really meant to suggest something like that. At the moment I have a bit too much on my plate, so I am glad to see this moving forward. I am a bit sad that I didn't succeed in starting a general vfs discussion about this. Oh well. As long as we get weird bugs like this fixed. Eric