Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2022 12:05:07 -0700
From:   Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "katie.morris@in-advantage.com" <katie.morris@in-advantage.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v16 mfd 1/8] mfd: ocelot: add helper to get regmap
 from a resource
Message-ID: <Yyi9YygQw+Z4wE43@colin-ia-desktop>
References: <20220905162132.2943088-1-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
 <20220905162132.2943088-2-colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
 <Yxm4oMq8dpsFg61b@google.com>
 <20220908142256.7aad25k553sqfgbm@skbuf>
 <YxoEbfq6YKx/4Vko@colin-ia-desktop>
 <20220919101453.43f0a4d5@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220919101453.43f0a4d5@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: =?us-ascii?Q?SQrpDKL43m5zHMxySfw02N9TwvsmJlCx6TBm+IW6aWylWFi/haS6P/VZbQcY?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?YRPEbiTP/rGKzwf731GpOFeweSztLbPuiDkAwx8O8UYhxe9lQDSGFk5Pt7cN?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?oIL23WJzOEYBB/YwiyNNy7c1vXMKQaRjDjxAaH255oHn3TR5QJQEOsIRblfL?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?1fGtvs01luJzKDRa0JmK35+jirhjHn5Ziw31fWubsLWmw2LN6qk1OPrm31lF?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?X170d77X3j6wO40NoKE1PGp0eopATPGQRQ1d2citxpmVzKHFsNnGm60FKgol?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?fn2liDZge4RNSXNv+AP8EPjLE6imKfdeqo5sf7Vntszk3Bwj1C9oFJss/AFy?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?/5xqhr2I2m8sSNDLQHUl3B1cWrkIZhWdA3t1yDhcAxvV8kr9dwJrHJfn3qVP?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?aIVGoF6qdTjaZCUEwpAtucOzEz7QnXv+OhriokFcUbPqB1Ru/V58h+JoBuzl?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?w6035kYZ+8Z0H7ndjvoJqkuZjB4opW9KiaMoLrNFosDEsOeguulcY+0cIG+p?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?pMnUcDZxk6x1cuZenjH4bBkuaL46yLrIOO3lPkb8sCOi9DDlPWeZ+JohIRbs?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?iVcJ/EVO/pMtXXDiP1d4d68ktsd+SGIvoA8PZGEbhchVDCIgKL4rOMdC6a/E?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?TfNuB3gUvCIt6fZ1LpAaxfbTrW0GWsgX2zXIM4vup1s7wny3P+xGpdy9Cogo?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?wqEzm4sKy133Xwpk2aRVfduGlzQ/85OsiTmc3N63BE9omTyuNmel70i34rGn?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?AytNuGq1azrShF7x07sqsh9fl9l+NGPOl414jtnA0SWMUuGrl9lbCPn+/tpp?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?FUceKdEv54N57Bjq+vOpw2uNOhH+kBwu7SHWB8GP0zraundu5CWcGVeXe3GO?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?e0SsMDABgEFSuhldbVvNHot0NiEU1HXZt3FbzisWX50VYtXaOz4SFPmWe1q7?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?TE5/U6DzOERKRHg7zufEQoWLzsWUmD7FYIglPxl/DXYMW2hjyvJS0J2iDjwm?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?lvF5iYG5UWqoYMlfMc4N3BOnDXJuEXHtbGqClJFXz0O4REDfXjXEjSWOV1D+?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?NmL2K3xMWTJRkBofMy0i9Yi2L8UMtpivMd/TT5ljua4N+FLcOWDZ4U+U1Xc9?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?R9F8KGYMPb67syexa7xM1nM+gyD3ax4Uy3ztrQZHwQzPJbW7m9pWZlaaOYUd?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?2B9IBmPFgH5E0uLrYtQ1yaGyjizDTXLCVA1mwn6qlkqznaqUB7+oW5wj8rE7?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?MJKP5df69s1+PBO9Zy5ro5pCD1BP4yEBhJQNXJSENKlVuc7+UyaNqpiWNrzT?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?AVlPG7GgIPzrhZPeH9wly0iDe6fjiIV+V82+/ujOwtmzvQ9osv8tuRBvjbkw?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?S4MPYETE88FvB60eHZyF5XMzzFgYjXPhhOx0eJwT4GtGlH8sWMZStG8+uoK3?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?mbEcxLVm3msfW/6WX4xypfZEmA0Ziy6GnAUAD1AAEXeGEAkCr5AJ7rv7MALk?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?zo2aE7OxHVZiAUv4Yd9L8ykkCyCFxtxZfuvAE/+lwDJ8029k54j/6q5Y4sjB?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?52nIn7H84jVmY4NAPl/bBRoQyowCyQ6GRVrNPvomthd6K5y29/nS4GP0jGNt?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?9A=3D=3D?=
X-OriginatorOrg: in-advantage.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b375bd7b-ce2c-404f-5eb2-08da9a71e76d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MWHPR1001MB2351.namprd10.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Sep 2022 19:05:23.3689
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 48e842ca-fbd8-4633-a79d-0c955a7d3aae
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: tpnq6mCUDeWRHcxgcAfhmj3y4fbGzGfssTZufQg0LDi1GcskuhYXet2ho5T73zsZsEUpDR8waUuS/A5K9aWbYbfGSnRu2N28S4w2vhA60NQ=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DS7PR10MB5117
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
        autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Jakub,

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 10:14:53AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:04:13 -0700 Colin Foster wrote:
> > My plan was to start sending RFCs on the internal copper phys and get
> > some feedback there. I assume there'll be a couple rounds and I don't
> > expect to hit this next release (if I'm being honest).
> > 
> > So I'll turn this question around to the net people: would a round or
> > two of RFCs that don't cleanly apply to net-next be acceptable? Then I
> > could submit a patch right after the next merge window? I've been
> > dragging these patches around for quite some time, I can do it for
> > another month :-)
> 
> FWIW RFC patches which don't apply cleanly seem perfectly fine to me.
> Perhaps note the base in the cover letter for those who may want to 
> test them.
> 
> We can pull Lee's branch (thanks!) if it turns out the code is ready
> long before the MW.

I'll quote Vladimir Oltean: "It mostly looks ok to me"

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220912155234.ds73xpn5ijjq3iif@skbuf/

If you pull in Lee's branch I would certainly make use of it in the next
2-3 weeks. I would probably send out the patch set for review in a day
or two.