Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757337AbXFTRL5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:11:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754451AbXFTRLi (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:11:38 -0400 Received: from srv1.netkinetics.net ([206.71.148.180]:50782 "EHLO srv1.netkinetics.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753640AbXFTRLh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:11:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 From: Tim Post Reply-To: tim.post@netkinetics.net To: Andrew McKay Cc: Alexandre Oliva , Linus Torvalds , Al Viro , Bernd Schmidt , Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Hazelton , Greg KH , debian developer , david@lang.hm, Tarkan Erimer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <4679557C.5080907@iders.ca> References: <20070614195517.GA4933@elte.hu> <20070614235004.GA14952@elte.hu> <20070615011012.6c09066e@the-village.bc.nu> <20070615012623.GA25189@elte.hu> <20070615101007.0cbfd078@the-village.bc.nu> <4673CA7C.5040207@t-online.de> <20070616181902.GB21478@ftp.linux.org.uk> <4679557C.5080907@iders.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Net Kinetics Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:08:04 +0800 Message-Id: <1182359284.6239.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - srv1.netkinetics.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - netkinetics.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 838 Lines: 24 On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 11:27 -0500, Andrew McKay wrote: > I'm not going to address whether GPLv3 changed the spirit of GPLv2, but saying > that licensing the Linux Kernel under GPLv3 will result in more contributions is > absolute BS. Is there a system in place that sort of keeps track? Argument aside, I'm really interested to see how adoption in devices encourages contributions (and what kinds of contributions it attracts). Anyone would be I guess. How do you guys keep up with it? My head almost blows up just thinking about it given the traffic of just _this_ list. TIA :) --Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/