Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3266580rwb; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:26:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6Lbb+L6PDlPyZ0xSDw+OJHSMMANA0GVsEPqKiuldMCIeVSTes6jQpDBN5VAHYGlxpRWXZA X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3808:b0:202:c5ba:d71b with SMTP id mq8-20020a17090b380800b00202c5bad71bmr1142909pjb.18.1663637164338; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:26:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663637164; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fTPjf5M0/vaL44+VJoCSkK0UPieoxE7DadKIda7q9naJLnJINNcqTXDPZ8M6yRtbgS ByP7y6vvr27VtXjn59yQSOZ4H862MrPAzMXkS185wY8PoetWJVovoBX3LnEav2tgTB17 VZ+Wil3GAhRVbvpt4bJAN3lcTFyd1/DyWzLecJ8UhSf20xJu3Jt07CrG470bSM1bqBZ3 MshaOTYNb38cQLa66ZcrhGQtVOC8+l6S4uE8CdMt7MWFrGqRe9BPXeJnUnys5+VFbSXd AQ9zUgw64nqy74PsBbKBYtKgFC/oLN41vc2ib76FM0ushsg2FIFTjXrpU4BhQfmqm8IF bKDA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=xEM78DA9vAlG5zrPlRQ/Wkwq/r1WdumNRcvFYfR+/4k=; b=ztnIXJe31SjDlFYxfzUEa4hp8b++J5OcwDyPeRevGeBdr2VzCYryQnIZCstpveyYuP R839k3I8J3sh9YX12e8xulTbC9P6qryUbUPld56dCXFTkPyZd7+IkI4Ritp1mXWGWnS0 r3svjbExDDAciVpt7P9I+AoQbvhsTYH4C1M49PXYBE9jlCwYSZizqCz2wyxxUgkB3IfW XY05D3ndvKQLgKIkfQ3P2AceJEpcYQKoYanURwVaFU8ctYbXdYygj/iKE5igBTUMMRMd FGOZbpF/iI8aQ0zIT0e5hvEa9m1JJZZfjEGGozrFZCRsZ/Fg5wlls7Gwu7PBXXVzWZW1 djng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=DKzflZJ1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11-20020a056a0002cb00b0050cfb4ff72dsi144318pft.52.2022.09.19.18.25.51; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 18:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=DKzflZJ1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229812AbiITA4F (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:56:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59696 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229577AbiITA4D (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 20:56:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599A648E82 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id r23so973886pgr.6 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:56:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=xEM78DA9vAlG5zrPlRQ/Wkwq/r1WdumNRcvFYfR+/4k=; b=DKzflZJ1w7k5XyXNplvbINHUyvKUnWeRp2N+BYaiKeikenfpZVH7zDWYedfRccmbiT MelH9q4FVlQDyINUZcJ08X8/XahJ1W0fu/4K0VhHRXf4yYVl9Dt5ndu4TfU8JYApQxJa 1jcV5ecAbazbIBRYtAHTStQzSVpSj6VztOwZPZ/c4RfzuLG7MpbEf7pYbE0PFOntzEx/ 0E9zR0ogzJ0ZmOMI5luMzf4pR7PEWw3u7abJI+o3kyB1vA7BhtW+foS+q2z9QavqWaQB nwGMegSRHV2X8sF23WeFLiraIKKPfD0LU6KFRrEALZzZAS4RZ++HpbowVEkv+QLtq/8+ 7WTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=xEM78DA9vAlG5zrPlRQ/Wkwq/r1WdumNRcvFYfR+/4k=; b=nMSfAChtn6pCr3tVzpzkGdGAatKLPAt63/1Z3xQSiEAt2b9tTiJGzc9zHf6cOyqjHs ZPAv9AiekjjVIM/2faruh2bmBQL9l2jP0RgjifQUYpw1ZT33e60qfZmRGbt/s6S5bIY4 kD85LrQG0kB7tiD93X4mpu6qUujK1MFQINl0PtAQFEqh9LomKMeyunYVMkTtEhvCpZ+4 I1U16IhREk+dorNdFrBGvZff+Ye4PYlEeArJx0awzhCqxv6H75w5IFJ9V6k1kJDbkgdh pzB9GGSQXG3P+i3DLGt0/cHXWidhWzS3hhTwhwwtewvpZVcriCuqA0BSXuh00li7c/D9 9vlA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1jy+HpVwWPWeDcr+Asvs9aX0YvNOzWOhk6TO7ORUNa8f1ozBYG 2rY2vua32cvbjFEN8wW68CK1sQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:16c4:b0:535:890:d4a with SMTP id l4-20020a056a0016c400b0053508900d4amr21412019pfc.0.1663635360679; Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n19-20020a170902d0d300b0017534ffd491sm8805pln.163.2022.09.19.17.56.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Sep 2022 17:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 00:55:56 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mlevitsk@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Message-ID: References: <20220811210605.402337-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20220811210605.402337-10-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220811210605.402337-10-pbonzini@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 11, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > kvm_vcpu_check_block() is called while not in TASK_RUNNING, and therefore > it cannot sleep. Writing to guest memory is therefore forbidden, but it > can happen on AMD processors if kvm_check_nested_events() causes a vmexit. > > Fortunately, all events that are caught by kvm_check_nested_events() are > also recognized by kvm_vcpu_has_events() through vendor callbacks such as > kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed() or kvm_x86_ops.nested_ops->has_events(), so > remove the call and postpone the actual processing to vcpu_block(). > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index 5e9358ea112b..9226fd536783 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -10639,6 +10639,17 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > return 1; > } > > + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) { > + /* > + * Evaluate nested events before exiting the halted state. > + * This allows the halt state to be recorded properly in > + * the VMCS12's activity state field (AMD does not have > + * a similar field and a vmexit always causes a spurious > + * wakeup from HLT). > + */ > + kvm_check_nested_events(vcpu); Continuing the conversation with myself, this "needs" to check the return of kvm_check_nested_events(). In quotes because KVM just signals "internal error" if vmx_complete_nested_posted_interrupt() fails, i.e. the VM is likely dead anyways, but again it's odd that the return of kvm_apic_accept_events() is checked but the direct call to kvm_check_nested_events() is not. > + } > + > if (kvm_apic_accept_events(vcpu) < 0) > return 0; > switch(vcpu->arch.mp_state) { > @@ -10662,9 +10673,6 @@ static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > static inline bool kvm_vcpu_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) > - kvm_check_nested_events(vcpu); > - > return (vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE && > !vcpu->arch.apf.halted); > } > -- > 2.31.1 >