Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:24:54 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-modules@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Let userspace know when snd-hda-intel needs i915
Message-ID: <20220920072454.4cf91f24@maurocar-mobl2>
In-Reply-To: <Ynl7xGy+a9MYjXi1@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <cover.1652113087.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
        <Ynl7xGy+a9MYjXi1@bombadil.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Luis,

On Mon, 9 May 2022 13:38:28 -0700
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:23:35PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Currently, kernel/module annotates module dependencies when
> > request_symbol is used, but it doesn't cover more complex inter-driver
> > dependencies that are subsystem and/or driver-specific.
> >   
> 
> At this pount v5.18-rc7 is out and so it is too late to soak this
> in for the proper level of testing I'd like to see for modules-next.
> So I can review this after the next merge window. I'd want to beat
> the hell out of this and if possible I'd like to see if we can have
> some test coverage for the intended goal and how to break it.

Any news with regards to this patch series?

Regards,
Mauro