Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:29:13 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v-mc tree with Linus' tree
Message-ID: <YylduXa12mtakuHT@wendy>
References: <20220920051905.500a52ce@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220920051905.500a52ce@canb.auug.org.au>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:19:05AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v-mc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   3f67e6997603 ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: fix incorrect pcie child node name")
>   e4009c5fa77b ("riscv: dts: microchip: mpfs: remove pci axi address translation property")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   2ad0883d86c8 ("riscv: dts: microchip: move the mpfs' pci node to -fabric.dtsi")
> 
> from the risc-v-mc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the latter change seems to include the other 2) and can

Yup, I test merged it after applying and that was my resolution too.
Thanks Stephen.

> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell