Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3691305rwb; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:23:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4vFjmfYRNH0uy1w4j6BHuTjXs6qdClNawDzKH47yPSpjRh9W1sv5GemOiZRhwyY/AbYB6J X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ac0c:b0:203:2d73:8ef5 with SMTP id o12-20020a17090aac0c00b002032d738ef5mr3090062pjq.180.1663669390631; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:23:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663669390; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zIPjYv9lzLMDg2WJBCwnU388em/ISHczq7c2VXxSrLOGhaWVfqccVN32ODhV/2W1Tv 9yEyRag8gQcgffqNjUOUQcltiiE47aGmx/7FRGBNR4SfcomETG/agQWyWUzO5Q/rBHkR roL4Ya5S6rv8b+x0CL6Rq0bTAmtcPNMTnrE4QFMD6Ey86S0HE70A6/EHLWHHcnIge0/o HXRjA35OG5lefGjGqHE4X6CAkqLXZkyQTr2bHpo6Ymo6KA04fOpvwEiOHDIZr3TVFyjk 38xxOnZP/oiZ26aSuPxJAPZ/5si9MWiTlBGhvphxjJdidipNRrev/TwNs5hFOqmkkCUM wK3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+hF2Ki78hAnxpeSOYK0kSPPzAulpCMRlq+DtsEEzTz8=; b=KY9JMFMazUcy3hhx4zEFnTJAStzmLqejMH/HeeUpZOiudjBZzaT/ia8BDGjZe1JYFI sLCIGXGf5K1taO/0LlEixxwyj5K/Dm4AZelbdTlgExO0ncqXXAkn15Q0BPgJEnM097pu vVrWpwE9qItNhjtZS6MX6+TOQyLiDvidVe1IrUUBFOKL7u/7DBuIXYuW50OeQtplmNPv V/r6bQEh9s2Vh4x+/S/3UGqoBNsKW5WSHhcd/nacAeSfTme2TfSE/fL65HMROSNV8oC5 LOfPJrxJS0JxqhJKeWpQJqXEMUxo354ydkJ3Rcostq3lzvIwVitPy6UBsOd3OH1qo7Un mwrA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m11-20020a056a00080b00b0052eb81ff734si1505470pfk.113.2022.09.20.03.22.58; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230452AbiITKCH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:02:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55346 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229985AbiITKCB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:02:01 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54994D16B; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 03:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB151205CD; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bo3VPAwjhi2n; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6695D2052E; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549A580004A; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:58 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:57 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B086E31829FB; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:01:57 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Li Zhong CC: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drivers/net/ethernet/3com: check the return value of vortex_up() Message-ID: <20220920100157.GV2950045@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20220919073631.1574577-1-floridsleeves@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220919073631.1574577-1-floridsleeves@gmail.com> X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 12:36:31AM -0700, Li Zhong wrote: > Check the return value of vortex_up(), which could be error code when > the rx ring is not full. > > Signed-off-by: Li Zhong > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c > index ccf07667aa5e..7806c5f60ac8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/3com/3c59x.c > @@ -1942,6 +1942,7 @@ vortex_error(struct net_device *dev, int status) > void __iomem *ioaddr = vp->ioaddr; > int do_tx_reset = 0, reset_mask = 0; > unsigned char tx_status = 0; > + int err; > > if (vortex_debug > 2) { > pr_err("%s: vortex_error(), status=0x%x\n", dev->name, status); > @@ -2016,7 +2017,9 @@ vortex_error(struct net_device *dev, int status) > /* Must not enter D3 or we can't legally issue the reset! */ > vortex_down(dev, 0); > issue_and_wait(dev, TotalReset | 0xff); > - vortex_up(dev); /* AKPM: bug. vortex_up() assumes that the rx ring is full. It may not be. */ > + err = vortex_up(dev); > + if (err) > + return; Why does that fix the bug mentioned in the above comment?