Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp4585691rwb; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:42:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM78u3I01U12Bueonnh7Ufz66RvUFqQ12Gxaxd6n2831jrAXDHCvxyAQNXQJrTYbVAhvyf72 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc8a:b0:781:3f5a:52c3 with SMTP id cs10-20020a170906dc8a00b007813f5a52c3mr10689160ejc.5.1663717357015; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:42:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663717357; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bg6pexQzXSTVDu74OWL+Z47kuDMmBn6jsZq9XUCvtZqTPECP2VDEIgmGmFbtM1Oj27 PNveaVxDlLN0e7uO5I3I2Utx6P42VbCRpQa1BZUbCd7Mw86KU9cgM6WWrrflqFLAoJ4N DoX0lXuQJ5TVGrSxY1kJqsJAL8hWR+IsODoNBrwHVQF8ugf7jk6qpu4eqRQMm+elHbYq N8sV7D43dxyVQUTBVu3l7uynUXbYsheAQdjTdyveYUuQeaPvv4zNM+HZ6MMjFqaiWRZf 9v9ZQfeEKI5aBIIuATZ+AszUY8gjGcpYQSLGiVQ5eq4++JIajTTHDmGWiZ0wwRaN5sAZ 52/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:reply-to:dkim-signature; bh=dYLN9GBGgw9bb1ictRproowJt/YAf1zd5j5g6hcPFfg=; b=mn9GUomCPqnojvNUe/Vbq8uITWSl7ar3QXgiDLmUP6Bb083tmjJVIZIfGQmBk0feIn 1U6yVU6fgBgrXzSkEgP9mB/TS3Pq3WDL4BUQowKhP2bAX8m4/KKBTEq5C4fOvrlawtmM pxB2tq7q3bTKJ/MOxNKxNsneeHC+qb5g0y4sWVkxWv+vQ0UVHhnom77zwE44SoS2C0lk 2CW2H5C5JlO1GegnEgYyfDvL2dsPaHrxxSJQPWyBpDiITTOFO/bTBsOLt7x4p/MGikS4 izBwjXlEhwEh+LeiPryVXhifBbr4MSWQlDLjF1MdIvb5mQ921KBKGHBFQyZb6VWK9pvB uVlw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="kNqSYhb/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sc23-20020a1709078a1700b0074171cca419si1182207ejc.892.2022.09.20.16.42.10; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:42:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b="kNqSYhb/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231202AbiITXcG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:32:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44860 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231139AbiITXbz (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:31:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x449.google.com (mail-pf1-x449.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::449]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95B927285C for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x449.google.com with SMTP id u131-20020a627989000000b0054d3cf50780so2488355pfc.22 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=dYLN9GBGgw9bb1ictRproowJt/YAf1zd5j5g6hcPFfg=; b=kNqSYhb/HAnrt536HOs7xUAP4Z2+7GGcDgLkQVMvZqfyl5tPjooDHiqOcT+hrnFN6E NV+klM1GvU8zWTdvsAQPfxnB+k72U8P3S9vAPn593sWkyBbLZDqrAJIah2qCIk8MQA5B BkKg+IbnGJ+iA+FRSstmyq2M2O3FKSbjt55t+bsFKCJDFGDdZ6gqnjh258gvh4GES1iP LL3NjesyU1IelEuHxXvC3J5TdXwm/79ao2Z4a9goLw5SEceUmR3aJDsQovaB6mP6Y36u GRPh+4hn6t9TEiGYM0/7cWKn7NzoNbjVzISOiJQvdJxAM7rW7tvReOt6UJMUrZCm0rmT tKSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=dYLN9GBGgw9bb1ictRproowJt/YAf1zd5j5g6hcPFfg=; b=wIzwfA+kpsiDRT+RUV+3qPzK2isqtK4DJ+M378GUdLRtWT+vFulK9SF+op7S0/zTA0 MIU22zWjT38EJwMUjjTMMtW2S9ETdmJVrGTGTs+vnb8uY7k0YfacBR6vc5PjtWR2a2ab zfZjA8kO1CaIxGDyD7joEgX5I5eHEtKf9MEA0H5Oyi3SejUbYM1PJE//iPW+VuYQlwhW 34Stg56kKCVc0sqwr4TH0w7FgPks9NYq9LwcU/7Y4kvTR7lZTpFu8RkglbeRRPHiyY6F A1y80VW7+Tibr8vYeTkKh618nut3Hhzw7i3M+XqISFid13V+v71cc34p+8NG1RauQeWS Eo5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf25kO861UJMHmjeZ6fhy7lwKhEF6KIwzXyX9sh1QM59DAisnoOX h6JJEvw7DX8L7E/N14elq/x4wNr2nMI= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:a407:b0:202:e6eb:4b7c with SMTP id y7-20020a17090aa40700b00202e6eb4b7cmr6297652pjp.15.1663716705161; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:31:11 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220920233134.940511-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220920233134.940511-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog Message-ID: <20220920233134.940511-6-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 05/28] KVM: x86: Don't inhibit APICv/AVIC if xAPIC ID mismatch is due to 32-bit ID From: Sean Christopherson To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alejandro Jimenez , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Maxim Levitsky , Li RongQing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Truncate the vcpu_id, a.k.a. x2APIC ID, to an 8-bit value when comparing it against the xAPIC ID to avoid false positives (sort of) on systems with >255 CPUs, i.e. with IDs that don't fit into a u8. The intent of APIC_ID_MODIFIED is to inhibit APICv/AVIC when the xAPIC is changed from it's original value, The mismatch isn't technically a false positive, as architecturally the xAPIC IDs do end up being aliased in this scenario, and neither APICv nor AVIC correctly handles IPI virtualization when there is aliasing. However, KVM already deliberately does not honor the aliasing behavior that results when an x2APIC ID gets truncated to an xAPIC ID. I.e. the resulting APICv/AVIC behavior is aligned with KVM's existing behavior when KVM's x2APIC hotplug hack is effectively enabled. If/when KVM provides a way to disable the hotplug hack, APICv/AVIC can piggyback whatever logic disables the optimized APIC map (which is what provides the hotplug hack), i.e. so that KVM's optimized map and APIC virtualization yield the same behavior. For now, fix the immediate problem of APIC virtualization being disabled for large VMs, which is a much more pressing issue than ensuring KVM honors architectural behavior for APIC ID aliasing. Fixes: 3743c2f02517 ("KVM: x86: inhibit APICv/AVIC on changes to APIC ID or APIC base") Reported-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit Cc: Maxim Levitsky Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c index adac6ca9b7dc..a02defa3f7b5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c @@ -2075,7 +2075,12 @@ static void kvm_lapic_xapic_id_updated(struct kvm_lapic *apic) if (KVM_BUG_ON(apic_x2apic_mode(apic), kvm)) return; - if (kvm_xapic_id(apic) == apic->vcpu->vcpu_id) + /* + * Deliberately truncate the vCPU ID when detecting a modified APIC ID + * to avoid false positives if the vCPU ID, i.e. x2APIC ID, is a 32-bit + * value. + */ + if (kvm_xapic_id(apic) == (u8)apic->vcpu->vcpu_id) return; kvm_set_apicv_inhibit(apic->vcpu->kvm, APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_APIC_ID_MODIFIED); -- 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog