Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp4593387rwb; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM78kMfG4l5Hc8US24talzDkPqJ/n6vBaddlR8WvAZWmSSQOQEJhK5Iy0iNBG9BQt51JYGKN X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a049:b0:77c:1f27:1b28 with SMTP id gz9-20020a170907a04900b0077c1f271b28mr20207209ejc.20.1663717935553; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1663717935; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vrjWq6cme2+EwkKOYU2zMnIvgiDPzRMy6sydDEsRvPtED2qsGsaOEmIbm+N9TIh7e1 4QOFzR/QHGlz2X2G0D9n6peHHsMPYJAJWRmZIBydn6aEZyTkGBqiXjM8r7CWVyMzdN8c icU5sLP0LKbgLTSYpcXtawOFgevXuGem3DHtSND4xLOpS5fi+E7b7Y/sX+kON8vR8vf9 E47GPD4WehvO2r4t4XuO87+pldUjwJjEmeKgUMCJNfx0zQbzTMPpTkvu0TjS7BNdTddf Cu9rwie71rKcwJD9Xr1alYhyBXUT0RkGZmhjgplg+20WLepQJGW/AoQxya7e0NrtxxuC 4hcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:reply-to:dkim-signature; bh=JZAIYdYCg9gsJwY7eA6nzFlm6TxDyiq9Q8zzDq9WamE=; b=dj/SWk3faylNsG4l54yZbanqBGH/+FEN6dQgMpCiVItbJdkbjlzDnWFHybq2kLoWaL OmEXzUjFZkSNjXubCS+LKZxdU/567a0BOKQAPK5F0kjwS9vRLk/vRymQAppn0Um+/V7G VO4ZQDcYAAKpto6Xoxq/VBrlyEFuWfzeG9VrjbRDl4tS2ghhtJSgM2PjjuZOgXUFGUDX HINCOgprcJFvSQ02FsKXL8+5v5vzizHOdvy0LzgGnJ+COcaZ0B2AQA56UpoRtapSIDUB c/yLdLa6rLBvPrTDvApV1csd/KNHQLoZV2m0+pvyCtoa4RQsnl6hwEs/tUqSE7tjjuF1 28iQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YWQAzjFU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cs18-20020a170906dc9200b007808d860c9dsi971832ejc.931.2022.09.20.16.51.49; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YWQAzjFU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231429AbiITXcn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:32:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231139AbiITXcI (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2022 19:32:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x44a.google.com (mail-pf1-x44a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::44a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F5B2786EB for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x44a.google.com with SMTP id z24-20020a056a001d9800b0054667d493bdso2513555pfw.0 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=JZAIYdYCg9gsJwY7eA6nzFlm6TxDyiq9Q8zzDq9WamE=; b=YWQAzjFU7mSAIBBpEEMWNuvmnTzsVnLRyJUTxMVfGlsNBLNsFJUVfUtCDdinXRigaJ gVdC/cngA61DrktBfUbUfLX2SzrWuJHBNCLwJVao1un1TWgVyLjRPtcFZw8ripVlXLpN c7K89ctFLKrGZUrs9+sAd7uESaXChOv/OxlbdQmr3UokDONz/mdLB2VYGGLE8GaLZTcO 7jPWJs4U6+Cn32RK0pQ+SvLmErOAvnm36xXjVrfKkSIA9or/61NEwLQZFcRsOEqqxjZz am78kmZ7SGGos06HNVUWtmSBL7iwinEvHfTFiDspb7LhE9lTz0+KP4OAIDtFuQhRksPJ 3gwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:reply-to:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=JZAIYdYCg9gsJwY7eA6nzFlm6TxDyiq9Q8zzDq9WamE=; b=DC3q7RYWPR53PUweCxvxhzcUdleh1qu9+easoD4+D4VICIk2ETHgADl+GAYUAgvz4X YDgKzClT9vHm5bRd/qdeA0mDsIl68VEE4SHoiwuCReCwb+1asc41zh14bksEfpHyJceE a30hrGywR0zWzn3pudOY6EGJkrKjFZOjCIwmba9AZhC/t2dQxZ+TZ2M5U/toSSS+L2ie NpPxVoOauHdKC6fhH0tTt/e+k5Jh3AcMa8Tf0qCTOZTmfkL7pCe4UBfLwILThc71VC5l 2d8h3cbIPXwz1xzeazJG7ayntJE76L+3A52ge3QLuPEjQdwhm3G06xKHKR6ohemArn3J ppcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1/bewW+nUAahDYt64UNIEAl4MC3Tcp0lYWbf/l5BqXnB4Nhe/q Auqxa8S0PCoslHTaYX9tm8D2pOeTkvs= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:5c37]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6a00:23d0:b0:550:d950:c03e with SMTP id g16-20020a056a0023d000b00550d950c03emr7166520pfc.16.1663716719135; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Sean Christopherson Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 23:31:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220920233134.940511-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220920233134.940511-1-seanjc@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog Message-ID: <20220920233134.940511-14-seanjc@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v3 13/28] KVM: SVM: Document that vCPU ID == APIC ID in AVIC kick fastpatch From: Sean Christopherson To: Sean Christopherson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alejandro Jimenez , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Maxim Levitsky , Li RongQing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Document that AVIC is inhibited if any vCPU's APIC ID diverges from its vCPU ID, i.e. that there's no need to check for a destination match in the AVIC kick fast path. Opportunistically tweak comments to remove "guest bug", as that suggests KVM is punting on error handling, which is not the case. Targeting a non-existent vCPU or no vCPUs _may_ be a guest software bug, but whether or not it's a guest bug is irrelevant. Such behavior is architecturally legal and thus needs to faithfully emulated by KVM (and it is). Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky --- arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c index 605c36569ddf..40a1ea21074d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c @@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ static int avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source cluster = (dest >> 4) << 2; } + /* Nothing to do if there are no destinations in the cluster. */ if (unlikely(!bitmap)) - /* guest bug: nobody to send the logical interrupt to */ return 0; if (!is_power_of_2(bitmap)) @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source if (WARN_ON_ONCE(index != logid_index)) return -EINVAL; - /* guest bug: non existing/reserved logical destination */ + /* Nothing to do if the logical destination is invalid. */ if (unlikely(!(logid_entry & AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK))) return 0; @@ -406,9 +406,13 @@ static int avic_kick_target_vcpus_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *source } } + /* + * KVM inhibits AVIC if any vCPU ID diverges from the vCPUs APIC ID, + * i.e. APIC ID == vCPU ID. Once again, nothing to do if the target + * vCPU doesn't exist. + */ target_vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(kvm, l1_physical_id); if (unlikely(!target_vcpu)) - /* guest bug: non existing vCPU is a target of this IPI*/ return 0; target_vcpu->arch.apic->irr_pending = true; -- 2.37.3.968.ga6b4b080e4-goog