Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283665AbRLEB0i>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:26:38 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S283662AbRLEB02>; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:26:28 -0500
Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:34317 "EHLO
	krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S283657AbRLEB0U> convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:26:20 -0500
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 02:26:17 +0100
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
Message-ID: <20011205022617.E28582@emma1.emma.line.org>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <E16BKL5-0001yJ-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <E16BKL5-0001yJ-00@DervishD.viadomus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 04 Dec 2001, Ra?lN??ez de Arenas Coronado wrote:

>     Python is not progress, is just bloatware. I don't think that the
> kernel *building* should be made dependant on such a fatware. And,
> how about the 'Python License'. I'm pretty sure that it is compatible
> with the rest of the kernel, but we should pray for it not to change.

You're free to prove there is a significantly leaner solution to the
tasks CML2 fulfills.

-- 
Matthias Andree

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."         Benjamin Franklin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/