Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:10:51 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, andi@lisas.de,
        puwen@hygon.cn, mario.limonciello@amd.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        rui.zhang@intel.com, gpiccoli@igalia.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
        gautham.shenoy@amd.com, Calvin Ong <calvin.ong@amd.com>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: processor_idle: Skip dummy wait for processors
 based on the Zen microarchitecture
Message-ID: <YysNW3+Fc2zOYcCq@zn.tnic>
References: <20220921063638.2489-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
 <YyrPqlo/ysCeh4qU@zn.tnic>
 <f927f969-028a-4ad4-7776-527ed537c77f@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f927f969-028a-4ad4-7776-527ed537c77f@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:09:16PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> I was not aware of cpu_feature_enabled() and it makes perfect sense to
> use it here.

It is no difference what the callers use - we simply want to unify the
interfaces and not have boot_cpu* and cpu_feature_* and so on. One is
enough and we want to use cpu_feature_enabled() everywhere possible.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette