Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To:     <rafael@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <travisghansen@yahoo.com>, <catalin@antebit.com>,
        <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>, <ruinairas1992@gmail.com>,
        <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>, <iam@decentr.al>, <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
        <davidedp91@gmail.com>, <marko.cekrlic.26@gmail.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] acpi/x86: s2idle: Add module parameter to prefer Microsoft GUID
Date:   Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:40:50 -0500
Message-ID: <20220921204055.22889-4-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220921204055.22889-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
References: <20220921204055.22889-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Sep 2022 20:40:55.0371
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 69a936f5-e0dc-425e-65e2-08da9c1194d8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DS1PEPF0000B077.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO6PR12MB5443
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham
        autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

OEMs have made some mistakes in the past for the AMD GUID support
and not populated the method properly.  To add an escape hatch for
this problem introduce a module parameter that can force using
the Microsoft GUID.

This is intentionally introduced to both Intel and AMD codepaths
to allow using the parameter as a debugging tactic on either.

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@gmail.com> # GA402RJ
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
---
v3->v4:
 * Rename parameter and string per Rafael's request
v2->v3:
 * Add tags
---
 drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
index 2c5931d247a2..725d2a6c87ed 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ static bool sleep_no_lps0 __read_mostly;
 module_param(sleep_no_lps0, bool, 0644);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(sleep_no_lps0, "Do not use the special LPS0 device interface");
 
+static bool prefer_microsoft_dsm_guid __read_mostly;
+module_param(prefer_microsoft_dsm_guid, bool, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(prefer_microsoft_dsm_guid, "Prefer using Microsoft GUID in LPS0 device _DSM evaluation");
+
 static const struct acpi_device_id lps0_device_ids[] = {
 	{"PNP0D80", },
 	{"", },
@@ -402,6 +406,9 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 	if (lps0_device_handle)
 		return 0;
 
+	lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
+						    ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_MICROSOFT, 0,
+						    &lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft);
 	if (acpi_s2idle_vendor_amd()) {
 		static const struct acpi_device_id *dev_id;
 		const struct amd_lps0_hid_device_data *data;
@@ -416,16 +423,12 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 		rev_id = data->rev_id;
 		lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
 					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
-		lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
-					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_MICROSOFT, 0,
-					&lps0_dsm_guid_microsoft);
 		if (lps0_dsm_func_mask > 0x3 && data->check_off_by_one) {
 			lps0_dsm_func_mask = (lps0_dsm_func_mask << 1) | 0x1;
 			acpi_handle_debug(adev->handle, "_DSM UUID %s: Adjusted function mask: 0x%x\n",
 					  ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID_AMD, lps0_dsm_func_mask);
 		} else if (lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft > 0 && data->prefer_amd_guid &&
-				(!strcmp(hid, "AMDI0007") ||
-				 !strcmp(hid, "AMDI0008"))) {
+				!prefer_microsoft_dsm_guid) {
 			lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = -EINVAL;
 			acpi_handle_debug(adev->handle, "_DSM Using AMD method\n");
 		}
@@ -433,7 +436,8 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
 		rev_id = 1;
 		lps0_dsm_func_mask = validate_dsm(adev->handle,
 					ACPI_LPS0_DSM_UUID, rev_id, &lps0_dsm_guid);
-		lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = -EINVAL;
+		if (!prefer_microsoft_dsm_guid)
+			lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (lps0_dsm_func_mask < 0 && lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft < 0)
-- 
2.34.1