Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   cgel.zte@gmail.com
To:     acme@kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
        namhyung@kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] perf lock: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:32:31 +0000
Message-Id: <20220922013231.232933-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-lock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
index 52a6a10a610c..b6837b7df110 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-lock.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static int lock_contention_caller(struct evsel *evsel, struct perf_sample *sampl
 			if (offset)
 				scnprintf(buf, size, "%s+%#lx", sym->name, offset);
 			else
-				strlcpy(buf, sym->name, size);
+				strscpy(buf, sym->name, size);
 			return 0;
 		}
 
-- 
2.25.1