Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   cgel.zte@gmail.com
To:     acme@kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
        namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] perf intel-pt: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 01:36:44 +0000
Message-Id: <20220922013644.233230-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
---
 tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
index 0ac860c8dd2b..0194e2003ba7 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ int intel_pt__strerror(int code, char *buf, size_t buflen)
 {
 	if (code < 1 || code >= INTEL_PT_ERR_MAX)
 		code = INTEL_PT_ERR_UNK;
-	strlcpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen);
+	strscpy(buf, intel_pt_err_msgs[code], buflen);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1