Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2022 14:34:40 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To:     "Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@gmail.com>, sanju.mehta@amd.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix some hotplug event issues
Message-ID: <YyxIUDIZM23tzmhg@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <20220921145434.21659-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
 <YysxhSh73nwMC1Kb@kroah.com>
 <6283792d-3c91-0ec2-6f2b-edd647d0de67@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6283792d-3c91-0ec2-6f2b-edd647d0de67@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Mario,

On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:48:17AM -0500, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> On 9/21/2022 10:45, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 09:54:31AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > On AMD Pink Sardine it's been observed that if another CM has run before
> > > the Linux CM that some registers may not match expectations which leads
> > > to a non-functional hotplug for PCIe devices.
> > > 
> > > Explicitly set these registers that have been observed to cause problems
> > > with hotplug to the defaults of the USB4 spec.
> > > 
> > > Mario Limonciello (2):
> > >    thunderbolt: Explicitly reset plug events delay back to USB4 spec
> > >      value
> > >    thunderbolt: Explicitly enable lane adapter hotplug events at startup
> > > 
> > >   drivers/thunderbolt/switch.c  |  5 +++++
> > >   drivers/thunderbolt/tb.h      |  1 +
> > >   drivers/thunderbolt/tb_regs.h |  1 +
> > >   drivers/thunderbolt/usb4.c    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >   4 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Any specific reason these were not tagged for stable backports?
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> No; no particular reason.  If Mika agrees with them, I think they are good
> candidates to include for stable too.  If I respin them, I'll tag
> accordingly.  If Mika picks them up as v1 I think he can add the tag when
> committing them.

I applied the first one to my fixes branch and tagged it for stable. For
the second one, I have a couple of comments that I would like you to
address (sent in a separate email) ;-)