Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755484AbXFUNmS (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:42:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751543AbXFUNmK (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:42:10 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.78] ([212.12.190.78]:32915 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032AbXFUNmJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:42:09 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:41:28 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Michal Piotrowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200706180141.41101.a1426z@gawab.com> <200706210626.20429.a1426z@gawab.com> <20070621130737.GN12950@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070621130737.GN12950@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706211641.28504.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1663 Lines: 43 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:26:20AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > We are talking about _tracking_. > > > > > > I'm not sure whether it makes much sense, and it would cost an > > > enormous amount of time, but tracking patches should be possible > > > without any knowledge of the kernel. > > > > If that's really true, which I can't imagine, then the proper way > > forward would probably involve a fully automated system. > > If you consider any kind of patch tracking valuable, you should either > do it yourself or write the tool yourself. In both cases, the > interesting parts would be how to integrate it into the workflow of > kernel development without creating extra work for anyone and how to get > the information into the got commits. Integration is the easy part, really. Just filter all the patches from the mailing list into a patch-bin, then sort, categorize, and prioritize them, responding with a validation status to all parties involved. And after that comes the Tracking part. > "requires a real PRO" and "would probably involve" sound like cheap > phrases for avoiding doing any work yourself. I have learned from this list that premature involvement is counterproductive. > Talk is cheap, but unless YOU will do it your emails will only be a > waste of bandwidth. Thanks, and good luck with involving people with this kind of response! -- Al - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/