Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755856AbXFUPjY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:39:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752250AbXFUPjR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:39:17 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:37857 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752336AbXFUPjQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:39:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:41:01 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move functions declarations to header file Message-Id: <20070621084101.73254fe7.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20070621145411.GA26091@redhat.com> References: <20070621145411.GA26091@redhat.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 900 Lines: 22 On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:54:11 -0300 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > Some interrupt entry points are currently defined in i8259.c > They probably belong in a header. Right now, their only user is > init_IRQ, justifying their declaration in-file. But when virtualization > comes in, we may be interested in using that functions in late > initializations. > > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa Patch is OK with me, but please insert patches inline in emails. Lots of people who use mutt do this, so it must work and is the preferred way. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/