Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>,
        Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine=2DK=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     kever.yang@rock-chips.com, sjg@chromium.org,
        philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
        miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
        kishon@ti.com, vkoul@kernel.org, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, broonie@kernel.org,
        wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
        zhangqing@rock-chips.com, jamie@jamieiles.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] dt-bindings: pwm: rockchip: add rockchip,rk3128-pwm
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:22:34 +0200
Message-ID: <2166557.taCxCBeP46@phil>
In-Reply-To: <20220920062149.o6gdhsh7bk5rl4ah@pengutronix.de>
References: <20220909212543.17428-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <f5dd0ee4-d97e-d878-ffde-c06e9b233e38@gmail.com> <20220920062149.o6gdhsh7bk5rl4ah@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Precedence: bulk

Am Dienstag, 20. September 2022, 08:21:49 CEST schrieb Uwe Kleine-K?nig:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:02:22AM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > Add rockchip,rk3128-pwm compatible string.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> Is the expectation that this goes in via PWM, or together with the other
> patches via the rockchip maintainers?

in general I think bindings always go through the subsystem that
they're targetting - PWM in this case.

Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>


Heiko