Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 23:40:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 23:40:47 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:47860 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Dec 2001 23:40:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:40:19 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Rasmus B?g Hansen Cc: Erik Tews , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tuning ext2 or ReiserFS to avoid fragmentation with large files? Message-ID: <20011204204019.F25292@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Rasmus B?g Hansen , Erik Tews , Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011204142047.N11967@no-maam.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:17:17AM +0100, Rasmus B?g Hansen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Erik Tews wrote: > > > If I remember right xfs has got a online-defragmentation utility. So > > have a look at xfs. > > > > I think xfs works different from reiserfs and ext2 when writing files to > > disk which helps avoiding fragmentation. This feature is called > > allocation groups. > > I *might* be wrong, but isn't the allocation-group thing exactly what > ext2/ext3 does? > Basically, yes. They both have the name "group" in some of their feature lists. What really matters is *what* they encompass, and *how* they're used. Can someone in the know comment about the similarity of the ext[23] and xfs groups? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/