Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760586AbXFUSGp (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:06:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759139AbXFUSGe (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:06:34 -0400 Received: from s2.ukfsn.org ([217.158.120.143]:53939 "EHLO mail.ukfsn.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758973AbXFUSGd (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:06:33 -0400 Message-ID: <467ABE25.7060303@dgreaves.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:06:29 +0100 From: David Greaves User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070601) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo Cc: David Chinner , David Robinson , LVM general discussion and development , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-pm , LinuxRaid , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc5 XFS fails after hibernate/resume References: <46744065.6060605@dgreaves.com> <4674645F.5000906@gmail.com> <46751D37.5020608@dgreaves.com> <4676390E.6010202@dgreaves.com> <20070618145007.GE85884050@sgi.com> <4676D97E.4000403@dgreaves.com> <4677A0C7.4000306@dgreaves.com> <4677A596.7090404@gmail.com> <4677E496.3080506@dgreaves.com> <4678DF56.1020903@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4678DF56.1020903@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4248 Lines: 101 been away, back now... Tejun Heo wrote: > David Greaves wrote: >> Tejun Heo wrote: >>> How reproducible is the problem? Does the problem go away or occur more >>> often if you change the drive you write the memory image to? >> I don't think there should be activity on the sda drive during resume >> itself. >> >> [I broke my / md mirror and am using some of that for swap/resume for now] >> >> I did change the swap/resume device to sdd2 (different controller, >> onboard sata_via) and there was no EH during resume. The system seemed >> OK, wrote a few Gb of video and did a kernel compile. >> I repeated this test, no EH during resume, no problems. >> I even ran xfs_fsr, the defragment utility, to stress the fs. >> >> I retain this configuration and try again tonight but it looks like >> there _may_ be a link between EH during resume and my problems... Having retained this new configuration for a couple of days now I haven't had any problems. This is good but not really ideal since / isn't mirrored anymore :( >> Of course, I don't understand why it *should* EH during resume, it >> doesn't during boot or normal operation... > > EH occurs during boot, suspend and resume all the time. It just runs in > quiet mode to avoid disturbing the users too much. In your case, EH is > kicking in due to actual exception conditions so it's being verbose to > give clue about what's going on. I was trying to say that I don't actually see any errors being handled in normal operation. I'm not sure if you are saying that these PHY RDY events are normally handled quietly (which would explain it). > It's really weird tho. The PHY RDY status changed events are coming > from the device which is NOT used while resuming yes - but the erroring device which is not being used is on the same controller as the device with the in-use resume partition. > and it's before any > actual PM events are triggered. Your kernel just boots, swsusp realizes > it's resuming and tries to read memory image from the swap device. yes > While reading, the disk controller raises consecutive PHY readiness > changed interrupts. EH recovers them alright but the end result seems > to indicate that the loaded image is corrupt. Yes, that's consistent with what I'm seeing. When I move the swap/resume partition to a different controller (ie when I broke the / mirror and used the freed space) the problem seems to go away. I am seeing messages in dmesg though: ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.00: revalidation failed (errno=-2) ata2: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 390721968 512-byte hardware sectors (200050 MB) sd 0:0:0:0: resuming sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00019807 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00019007 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00019007 ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0x00019807 ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310) ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ATA: abnormal status 0xD0 on port 0xf881e0c7 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100 ata2.00: revalidation failed (errno=-2) ata2: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs > So, there's no device suspend/resume code involved at all. The kernel > just booted and is trying to read data from the drive. Please try with > only the first drive attached and see what happens. That's kinda hard; swap and root are on different drives... Does it help that although the errors above appear, the system seems OK when I just use the other controller? I have to be cautious what I do with this machine as it's the wife's active desktop box . David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/