Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757921AbXFUT5B (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759494AbXFUT4u (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:56:50 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:15356 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759467AbXFUT4t (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:56:49 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,448,1175497200"; d="scan'208";a="257350630" From: Jesse Barnes To: "Yinghai Lu" Subject: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:56:12 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 Cc: "Andi Kleen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Justin Piszcz" , "Eric W. Biederman" References: <200706071530.51552.jesse.barnes@intel.com> <86802c440706211240s27d58679k43cee4488ce8a70e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86802c440706211240s27d58679k43cee4488ce8a70e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706211256.12551.jesse.barnes@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2246 Lines: 55 On Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:40:58 Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 6/7/07, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On some machines, buggy BIOSes don't properly setup WB MTRRs to > > cover all available RAM, meaning the last few megs (or even gigs) > > of memory will be marked uncached. Since Linux tends to allocate > > from high memory addresses first, this causes the machine to be > > unusably slow as soon as the kernel starts really using memory > > (i.e. right around init time). > > > > This patch works around the problem by scanning the MTRRs at > > boot and figuring out whether the current end_pfn value (setup > > by early e820 code) goes beyond the highest WB MTRR range, and > > if so, trimming it to match. A fairly obnoxious KERN_WARNING > > is printed too, letting the user know that not all of their > > memory is available due to a likely BIOS bug. > > > > Something similar could be done on i386 if needed, but the boot > > ordering would be slightly different, since the MTRR code on i386 > > depends on the boot_cpu_data structure being setup. > > > > This patch incorporates the feedback from Eric and Andi: > > - use MAX_VAR_RANGES instead of NUM_VAR_RANGES > > - move array declaration to header file as an extern > > - add command line disable option "disable_mtrr_trim" > > - don't run the trim code if the MTRR default type is cacheable > > - don't run the trim code on non-Intel machines > > > > Justin, feel free to test again if you have time and add your > > "Tested-by" signoff. > > > > Andi, as for large pages, do you think this is ok as is, or should > > I trim a larger granularity? If so, what granularity? > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes > > > > Thanks, > > Jesse > > NAK. > > for AMD Rev F Opteron later CPU, BIOS will not set WB in MTRR for 4G > above mem. > > This patch will get rid of those RAM. Yeah, Eric already mentioned that. I'll rework it to only run on Intel CPUs per Eric's last mail. Thanks, Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/