Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2022 20:21:35 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Minturn Dave B <dave.b.minturn@intel.com>,
        Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Xiong Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <martin.oliveira@eideticom.com>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <ckulkarnilinux@gmail.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/8] mm: introduce FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA to gate getting
 PCI P2PDMA pages
Message-ID: <Yy4/f+s1jOCm7dFo@ziepe.ca>
References: <20220922163926.7077-1-logang@deltatee.com>
 <20220922163926.7077-2-logang@deltatee.com>
 <Yy33LUqvDLSOqoKa@ziepe.ca>
 <64f8da81-7803-4db4-73da-a158295cbc9c@deltatee.com>
 <Yy4Ot5MoOhsgYLTQ@ziepe.ca>
 <2327d393-af5c-3f4c-b9b9-6852b9d72f90@deltatee.com>
 <Yy46KbD/PvhaHA6X@ziepe.ca>
 <3840c1c6-3a5c-2286-e577-949f0d4ea7a6@deltatee.com>
 <Yy48GPMdQS/pzNSa@ziepe.ca>
 <aa5d51dd-0b40-29c0-69af-e83043541d3e@deltatee.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aa5d51dd-0b40-29c0-69af-e83043541d3e@deltatee.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:14:11PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022-09-23 17:07, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 05:01:26PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2022-09-23 16:58, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:11:03PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2022-09-23 13:53, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 01:08:31PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>>>> I'm encouraging Dan to work on better infrastructure in pgmap core
> >>>>> because every pgmap implementation has this issue currently.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For that reason it is probably not so relavent to this series.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Perhaps just clarify in the commit message that the FOLL_LONGTERM
> >>>>> restriction is to copy DAX until the pgmap page refcounts are fixed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, I'll add that note.
> >>>>
> >>>> Per the fix for the try_grab_page(), to me it doesn't fit well in 
> >>>> try_grab_page() without doing a bunch of cleanup to change the
> >>>> error handling, and the same would have to be added to try_grab_folio().
> >>>> So I think it's better to leave it where it was, but move it below the 
> >>>> respective grab calls. Does the incremental patch below look correct?
> >>>
> >>> Oh? I was thinking of just a very simple thing:
> >>
> >> Really would like it to return -EREMOTEIO instead of -ENOMEM as that's the
> >> error used for bad P2PDMA page everywhere.
> > 
> > I'd rather not see GUP made more fragile just for that..
> 
> Not sure how that's more fragile... You're way seems more dangerous given
> the large number of call sites we are adding it to when it might not
> apply.

No, that is the point, it *always* applies. A devmap struct page of
the wrong type should never exit gup, from any path, no matter what.

We have two central functions that validate a page is OK to return,
that *everyone* must call.

If you don't put it there then we will probably miss copying it into a
call site eventually.

> > try_grab_page() calls folio_ref_inc(), that is only legal if it knows
> > the page is already a valid pointer under the PTLs, so it is safe to
> > check the pgmap as well.
> 
> My point is it doesn't get a reference or a pin unless FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET is
> set and the documentation states that neither might be set, in which case 
> folio_ref_inc() will not be called...

That isn't how GUP is structured, all the calls to try_grab_page() are
in places where PIN/GET might be set and are safe for that usage.

If we know PIN/GET is not set then we don't even need to call the
function because it is a NOP.

Jason