Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: ie3994620:Fastmail
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 03:09:54 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Disable W^X detection and enforcement on 32-bit
Message-ID: <20220924000954.hhaghgkrb6h33nvq@box.shutemov.name>
References: <20220923221730.1860518-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220923221730.1860518-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:17:30PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The 32-bit code is in a weird spot.  Some 32-bit builds (non-PAE) do not
> even have NX support.  Even PAE builds that support NX have to contend
> with things like EFI data and code mixed in the same pages where W+X
> is unavoidable.
> 
> The folks still running X86_32=y kernels are unlikely to care much about
> NX.  That combined with the fundamental inability fix _all_ of the W+X
> things means this code had little value on X86_32=y.  Disable the checks.

Maybe downgrade the check to a warning for X86_32=y?

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov