Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Remove useless function
 parameter
To:     Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
        "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        "jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>
CC:     "cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>
References: <20220922083928.58797-1-liulongfang@huawei.com>
 <20220922083928.58797-4-liulongfang@huawei.com>
 <d98867217f4047709de00d610ad2e8b8@huawei.com>
From:   liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <5f6c62a5-9ccf-c130-7285-aa8cedbf65c9@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 09:45:41 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d98867217f4047709de00d610ad2e8b8@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2022/9/23 18:30, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: liulongfang
>> Sent: 22 September 2022 09:39
>> To: alex.williamson@redhat.com; jgg@nvidia.com; Shameerali Kolothum
>> Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
>> Cc: cohuck@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> linuxarm@openeuler.org; liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Remove useless function
>> parameter
>>
>> Remove unused function parameters for vf_qm_fun_reset() and
>> ensure the device is enabled before the reset operation
>> is performed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
> 
> Hi Longfang,
> 
> This one seems to have a merge conflict on top of vfio/next branch.
> May be better to rebase and send a v3 picking up Jason's R-by as well?
> 

I merged this patchset to the latest tag version vfio-v6.0-rc5 of the
vfio/next branch, and there is no merge conflict.

Which patchset do you refer to as "Jason's R-by"? Can you provide the
title of this patchset?

> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c | 8 +++++---
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> index 0638a8a6b0c1..24c03ff41502 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>> @@ -345,8 +345,7 @@ static struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device
>> *hssi_acc_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>  			    core_device);
>>  }
>>
>> -static void vf_qm_fun_reset(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev,
>> -			    struct hisi_qm *qm)
>> +static void vf_qm_fun_reset(struct hisi_qm *qm)
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>>
>> @@ -662,7 +661,10 @@ static void hisi_acc_vf_start_device(struct
>> hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vd
>>  	if (hisi_acc_vdev->vf_qm_state != QM_READY)
>>  		return;
>>
>> -	vf_qm_fun_reset(hisi_acc_vdev, vf_qm);
>> +	/* Make sure the device is enabled */
>> +	qm_dev_cmd_init(vf_qm);
>> +
>> +	vf_qm_fun_reset(vf_qm);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int hisi_acc_vf_load_state(struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device
>> *hisi_acc_vdev)
>> --
>> 2.33.0
> 
> .
>