Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp1971167rwb; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7W8Qt850PBX4H3CG9Aw7aFtBah5sfgVca4nIp7mNIR4qOo2W8b7ArTf+RoqRBSZeD+g0ox X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c2:b0:178:2ca7:fade with SMTP id i2-20020a17090332c200b001782ca7fademr12236965plr.71.1664003402357; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664003402; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CjSIvA1sab6rhKeN4qDEi8akf4n1jVcy9y2ZRXd/CHR3N6q6KaphTQtDLHKZXy2+hX EU1475UhxIPyed4PaV79B/u9OJQwYdFB6puM871utIpv7iDsD6QxCUDAiIrEj63ryKWh k5OxvJzajbXT8NEoR/FlUnCwnURp2e+lb2aWi+qlc4R9W5zlVHGpD4BxRXFyLJmBksA3 pnF6gXkKn09NdO8/6PN2eNXhGEnyRdqLdFM0GIeG0ZK6kXlkDNjTObnFfMH9Cecf98yb GDv2I7DhwaECoXemEGYvzhniAB16509rEL0ZnC3mOQRoVdetx1vcXNbRV4jOTEjci0IB fwUQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=emY21qk/ZfJgKldq05p0//jaBtF7OQGgCZUbCkhohso=; b=ONe56bcAcpJo5oz6DzVuAGG/eKZ1AARVlXFuzomYIRVclYhFgpSGtaC0xooW3GPJUy 6NyfPxnoCFd5R7rpslfhmTcIZAGtfi3i67bWOzQFwBxeLyODaJTN5WFORDFIQ/EwvoQO SX0OCBu/6yUTEQDKQBVGw3V64F6Bg55MK7tOMwwZtSLCK0/UmjkzsZBswE7/7ugFwMs0 VaDC5PuBix3A6wW/RjzZ6P3BsRF7LIiGpy4jh+Ylqv1vDWz6CW08lfxZM+OHYCYt6KJ5 zP5ApUXwfOi/Wzg1J/JrD1OdLSQJMOSJbUR7e4ydvy32CacWztgVrfK9TYNW4F/1iK9h mZQg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=KaeXkFVe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 68-20020a630547000000b0043934d9399fsi11478158pgf.159.2022.09.24.00.09.44; Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=KaeXkFVe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233247AbiIXGww (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 24 Sep 2022 02:52:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52510 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229573AbiIXGwu (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Sep 2022 02:52:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A641CB2A; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id p1-20020a17090a2d8100b0020040a3f75eso2132941pjd.4; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:52:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=emY21qk/ZfJgKldq05p0//jaBtF7OQGgCZUbCkhohso=; b=KaeXkFVe+dMPui9e25XdO6WVWZYIzmf9fKX27ikq2fcdg7bg7k/g7c6ptmtcokUPIr jPhuL6ReWbNafgxcNNZiFWKguhfWwxbvf7K8SPdQrNMPXR47rmmqC9RmFBQDQ3QTk3Rs +9JFiUtr6wzgVGLRZHFGuzqHbOQMJZhQZujybM+tUpeUP0eZobINmd1XC+vZ3/pCj1I0 hu8sJYsErH6jy/yWd5JLY0P+oLwBAgX8w2pd2LIzFHkYTeQ82LCDnIBOjIgRzY0o+Wox s9VLSjx37rwBsNWGUrCuzZ2lITf3Ap3JNjplW8kNTBGx3xptAAMQ3bmauFJ9Zy5A8Qak OFgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=emY21qk/ZfJgKldq05p0//jaBtF7OQGgCZUbCkhohso=; b=Jjy5ALGgpru1tBXWCLKgLH3Bhbqriw1uG4FuN2tapTLd0muwE4XYwTADg/tlKcTO92 WajNYDEw+EEhNT8wJks7eUmqPsfU3ojOssgPRzgDnVXfrJJfzbtcWqmmZAnG1t9VC8iY 5TOQWyXxKJr60YhKrFKgyLT+oSZZMqpo/LV9DGIPp3H19w+m5Gj+1uz6bXYe6Fo1Aus6 JON+gX+OZ0YPsRCo6HV1pzs+IzN9kf2o0evOojoyA3JKSPqcl3sAs95r2spuWWoSXhH9 298P0XyaLQ88AK7qZo2BJIetaX0ySN7LQ+LzSnYYTVvl1qZ4IVfFToaAhd0p9Yc/hiU6 YAbw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0gCqvpAMefraxU9l1sUpVTAhwCHWVQA5bdCw6auspTSEcY2+to It/t0zkrawIjmNZn61OZe5c= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e951:b0:178:93cf:3ebe with SMTP id b17-20020a170902e95100b0017893cf3ebemr12016162pll.74.1664002368960; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.roeck-us.net ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bb11-20020a170902bc8b00b0016c57657977sm7082585plb.41.2022.09.23.23.52.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 23:52:45 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Disable W^X detection and enforcement on 32-bit Message-ID: <20220924065245.GA705155@roeck-us.net> References: <20220923221730.1860518-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220923221730.1860518-1-dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:17:30PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > The 32-bit code is in a weird spot. Some 32-bit builds (non-PAE) do not > even have NX support. Even PAE builds that support NX have to contend > with things like EFI data and code mixed in the same pages where W+X > is unavoidable. > > The folks still running X86_32=y kernels are unlikely to care much about > NX. That combined with the fundamental inability fix _all_ of the W+X > things means this code had little value on X86_32=y. Disable the checks. > > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel > Cc: Darren Hart > Cc: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Borislav Petkov > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Cc: Kees Cook > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMj1kXHcF_iK_g0OZSkSv56Wmr=eQGQwNstcNjLEfS=mm7a06w@mail.gmail.com/ Tested-by: Guenter Roeck Guenter > --- > arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c > index 20b1e24baa85..efe882c753ca 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c > @@ -587,6 +587,14 @@ static inline pgprot_t verify_rwx(pgprot_t old, pgprot_t new, unsigned long star > { > unsigned long end; > > + /* > + * 32-bit has some unfixable W+X issues, like EFI code > + * and writeable data being in the same page. Disable > + * detection and enforcement there. > + */ > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) > + return new; > + > /* Only enforce when NX is supported: */ > if (!(__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX)) > return new; > -- > 2.34.1 >