Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To:     Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, kbusch@kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1663731123-81536-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
References: <894e18a4-4504-df48-6429-a04c222ca064@kernel.dk> <1663731123-81536-1-git-send-email-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-mq: hctx has only one ctx mapping is no need to redirect the completion
Message-Id: <166403181034.5940.4446452471783801931.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2022 09:03:30 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:32:03 +0800, Liu Song wrote:
> From: Liu Song <liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> High-performance NVMe devices usually support a large hw queue, which
> ensures a 1:1 mapping of hctx and ctx. In this case there will be no
> remote request, so we don't need to care about it.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] blk-mq: hctx has only one ctx mapping is no need to redirect the completion
      commit: f168420c62e7a106961f2489a89f6ade84fe3f27

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe