Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756833AbXFUWec (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:34:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753983AbXFUWeY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:34:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54201 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753333AbXFUWeX (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:34:23 -0400 Message-ID: <467AFCEC.2070203@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:34:20 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert Organization: Red Hat User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070530) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Zolt=E1n_HUBERT?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <9a8748490706211529yca0588dgd1f7e0b86f7e4a62@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a8748490706211529yca0588dgd1f7e0b86f7e4a62@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 683 Lines: 19 On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > I myself have argued that we should be focusing more on stability and > regression fixing, but I'm not so sure that a 2.6.7 devel branch would > solve this. In general the 2.6.x.y -stable kernels seem to be doing > the job pretty good. > Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting worse... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/