Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+G9fYtt-921LH=fcVtaOkzfb-sA-0Qht4hrNhmGS5f_S0P+cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YyytP71y2GosUOhr@fedora>
In-Reply-To: <YyytP71y2GosUOhr@fedora>
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2022 14:12:29 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYtLwCiJeVO1UeJSU5iTrz9MmX3VWZZVFZxFPeSyGWT98g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
 address 00000010 - PC is at mempool_alloc
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 23 Sept 2022 at 00:15, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:11:42PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > [Please ignore this email if it is already reported]
> > Following kernel crash noticed on qemu-arm with linked config [1] running the
> > Linux next-20220916 to next-20220921.
>
> Does this mean the test passed with next-20220916 and failed with
> next-20220921?

I mean to say like this,
GOOD: next-20220914
BAD:  next-20220916

- Naresh