Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <441153f6-26ee-cbb2-fe42-101de91952c5@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:54:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220925112103.148836-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <08E290AD-C842-4BF2-9C57-2CE59A4C5D88@linaro.org>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <08E290AD-C842-4BF2-9C57-2CE59A4C5D88@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 25/09/2022 13:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> 
> 
> On 25 September 2022 14:21:03 GMT+03:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>> There is no point to allow selecting pin-controller drivers for Qualcomm
>> ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa.  This makes
>> kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the Qualcomm
>> SoCs.  There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and ARMv8/9 SoCs, so no
>> features/options are lost.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> I haven't checked which restrictions apply to msm8916 at this moment, but it might be worth adding 'depends on ARM || ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST'

This is limited by ARCH_QCOM (top-level if in the file), so I am not
sure what would be benefits.

Best regards,
Krzysztof