Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3508740rwb; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7GQ6XyYY149qGWcrs45Q92CF2EJWLQY6wznNQ/9fLgGAjg49Z/S0eYoeamAMl2jZxYihhl X-Received: by 2002:a65:6e8c:0:b0:435:144e:445e with SMTP id bm12-20020a656e8c000000b00435144e445emr16427941pgb.96.1664116919120; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664116919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LbbwUVeNueuMTWVhfUJjopqMUgZ7Nfrka/QHvp8vhGsXTzDbjG5MTVTT77CXggQafm 9SH4QZPdn8FS2TT9JfSg6SjKwDf9GxFZB3LByM+ishVIejd2iB3NIuXOYV+JGUEiuSLF EoK2ScLn6wmUrYY5IugLDm81rGrIho6IospJg7wPvTPczT+e2rIEpzIpItt4YXn0UC2n IcvGsGV7/N5tLsxSg3JOK0lAJcFKGDR1csfE8JUN/M8P2xLt2GbABjxTUw7fS2wDmpiT VnnfnUQSiHIqxMT6g+KRDdQfab4a1HAziGfr44AZI9rQljdfbb3U7/Hye0LrAxKCRUYN uh3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=jqCM4Tw0SjP4ntDGVVw2bf91oVLVAILXblqbgeaqRzM=; b=uUb0bmMqY67bny7B20c6jtqQr3vUyAcHjYve4I8S+30NW92tgK4YS/zXiWRG0LIauN jkNUzreqGNljiC65Prxwk2/rmAkzsEPB84KyXELOL/hjm9HnK5qeKsW6OTxe2XOUY8nk BBnXnq8OmLZP7bPL3Xc8/UyJhcCf31yfOW3ZQ52e7ShbpBITEgs9fyonx50xQbVI1tbW FBV10UcrdcTnQeOxq8x8vffgiHxJF59cElWc9ehbzJIktUscS2RcKzMWaK9q9CEGDQ2y +uLXe+RGwBp/tf6kD1iPYok7NMUKWQxC8Nuwhl8Xy0nqxo+MlxlYSw28GtDXUh9Bmw82 HREA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TI86nt62; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l192-20020a6391c9000000b0043863322f07si15447117pge.805.2022.09.25.07.41.47; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=TI86nt62; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232457AbiIYOcu (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:32:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33354 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231727AbiIYOcp (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:32:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1130.google.com (mail-yw1-x1130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91512CCB2; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1130.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3450990b0aeso44932097b3.12; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:32:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=jqCM4Tw0SjP4ntDGVVw2bf91oVLVAILXblqbgeaqRzM=; b=TI86nt62XRAYj79RHwfVVQVu60YM/wN/P/4QSUVJ+2qamFklY3tcm8lwM8nvDHdpil yD/NiLmNMHJ9ALq4iuQc+IIg3s9ELaIvOKLQwfamYYxUT9ma4Qx4csupnakAF1orRCC9 jWZ4ZeCO1s2JZjDMdtvSXraI1auuTrsLnfQHU9SLsjWwkmKIxoR0+PG1HcdFlyKTCA+H GBT5bQp6xT/nQKqMgNd/jMq1naX/z8QWS1cslEjrUMnoz9ZTAwzj4A51PnmLxfYEQ4MM u0xpPk/k0I0vTMnSvObFIII72Ugobo8gjYeH6IwK2FLeVhEp3SYYy/f2ftiW/RcIzWYu NY3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=jqCM4Tw0SjP4ntDGVVw2bf91oVLVAILXblqbgeaqRzM=; b=lDErUPP93DwkrKNswtnL9nGECwsBLkbYVpFEdgovvrZ3UlLZVX6oTUPy7SPbo4cvDS UxvsQe/t5Cbd7kGBFZyQg5uoE6gDzt4eGTQR28mUl/z+jb8eDM1FJHsTdNr5DiEu0Coy Eyh3Si20wGJnFsAwbR/zy6wVfjilIEiLQnxIFJVRjc1hHYwMN8n2VC51LX9f0M6tNky7 fStEIQ4eJn/Yqri/43j1s3kbjUDw6UmXIBbtidA1xDshg62dwdzBh8ozh255XIA9nZGk aah6WqUued2Hvb2c5ktUgPvXdvKk4klCPlLP4wOOyUfj6MJRBu5o1SDphmf5xqBGX/vk Aq+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0ImluHFkmCktR96HgapxLMKr+EvMR9UThTdtgsIpi2Rbgqy1h/ nax7vmomLjBUWbWcF9E0+mWYPOvv0laHPJOwv0w= X-Received: by 2002:a81:99d7:0:b0:350:931f:99e with SMTP id q206-20020a8199d7000000b00350931f099emr5268129ywg.325.1664116361883; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220925103529.13716-1-yongw.pur@gmail.com> <20220925103529.13716-2-yongw.pur@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: yong w Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 22:32:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 stable-4.19 1/3] mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx To: Greg KH , jaewon31.kim@samsung.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, wang.yong12@zte.com.cn, Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Minchan Kim , Mel Gorman , Linus Torvalds Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH =E4=BA=8E2022=E5=B9=B49=E6=9C=8825=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E6=97=A5 19:00=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 03:35:27AM -0700, wangyong wrote: > > From: Joonsoo Kim > > > > [ backport of commit 3334a45eb9e2bb040c880ef65e1d72357a0a008b ] > > This is from 5.8. What about the 5.4.y kernel? Why would someone > upgrading from 4.19.y to 5.4.y suffer a regression here? > I encountered this problem on 4.19, but I haven't encountered it on 5.4. However, this should be a common problem, so 5.4 may also need to be merged. Hello, Joonsoo, what do you think? > And why wouldn't someone who has this issue just not use 5.10.y instead? > What prevents someone from moving off of 4.19.y at this point in time? > This is a solution, but upgrading the kernel version requires time and over= head, so use the patch is the most effective way, if there is. Thanks. > thanks, > > greg k-h