Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp3516073rwb; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5RqcPwDGdOdPUdpywsr773oNycllJCcFii4MpIYuqF+GNLe7nvdl3MFu13J7P5OMYPZcOb X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2b8f:b0:453:2e59:364d with SMTP id fj15-20020a0564022b8f00b004532e59364dmr17956381edb.254.1664117407626; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664117407; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SIjic7eowFgHwu+vrR8hSMCjdtGcvYHXZc6s9dtgKFMlZQVxKp4qj9uH5YpCtHxnA6 gF5rRQSnB6XKlTQo69hLiN6yaC7RJBHPnV4sog24fX80TI59DjNO4KtDFvOSdjPvTX4x r3Ht+D8MbR4GnGXchlHAr81tf20lGhjhGVTV5DnLIbdpgsC8dQKR9ELPz5Op4MlRYrNK jPdE2Kaxli9MdhpN9SSxxNODCUtYSLGjbwqyVWg/ZW/P/gvHKvpBpAJoBrgVcXyV+nZu QthgOorYs2/cAbYeZIW4hUpqPYma9jvM26vMvql5N52gj9Rq8FhteXXRSUlgMBDtLtsc Zqog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=McxzoSyGgN0mMu4LmDTxJ3mXTH5u5yE8fp9dw11YuUg=; b=BsL9OVc37HQXOJoofM2/R193WA3qTrb+rEOp5boD3LGngX7KZPEo7hL105PmDOARGc 30GQTGRgReUSImvtqJwN+KjuZvOteQVOCi0SQjMKkm4Iumo6tQyk54ZlaT3I6aF1ji7+ E8JYJw1HuNtODvSY7AAxDIhvRpu2L/RDaFMcNf2qx+gJZWVKW1QTy3viX36R5f1LldSM lwnYWmmi7KIK7EsaHbY4Hw8rkIFccFNSKmo5xXNJkFM5Evss0bpN/ZcwHZQTMWguTljj /b8YRWy7EvXOtQrVnRxQw3GSYZ+HHqibY+Nooc1a+UbNE5E324gB3jVfbivVxxmdhohw cv0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Mw07vpbb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt15-20020a170907728f00b0077b49a2aca5si13481047ejc.393.2022.09.25.07.49.41; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Mw07vpbb; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230519AbiIYOln (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:41:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41116 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231390AbiIYOlX (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 10:41:23 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51A82DA8F for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id n15so6711271wrq.5 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to :cc:subject:date; bh=McxzoSyGgN0mMu4LmDTxJ3mXTH5u5yE8fp9dw11YuUg=; b=Mw07vpbbd2RUDvXabW7GB3HZUgWS+JdnKszKXl5YvMnuIjIeoqL70Tj3xqjwFXLOPJ OmR/x/ow7c7DLgIQ1L1Ipx6TEP3ecbOlhNwGovIacDFzlOYydOkFsBasHIx7tNimketO 50hr6awGxlc54VdC4Vbti/XB84tl5riBKZbz2D0RhBQfQjndbagYjByYoOXH7pdDOStO B4A8kDZaGHIuUzAJ6ZmJ/GBgahOv6NBSLUoWfbs3noM2OohZdtbnm+Ndq+HPxK127+5O xBRK1RRsveJVwoeZoy8hQSWP62XlTp0nM+GWd+Q++J50r5eiWk+YEP3eVpmNdS1Et+1x gPhQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=McxzoSyGgN0mMu4LmDTxJ3mXTH5u5yE8fp9dw11YuUg=; b=W7LGex4PavGpIjPXe0WD0GFxfmb0qJcorW+J8pD7ceqsveFmxN0p7yVypsWIUk9eAA 6sjnrjNmwNW1hfah6XsyycyslnU7Lz8Re4Una+nrkEty6MqAu3OZkhzWDAXSgZm54Pu/ As50Fr8GTGqTKGg4vkGx0Kw9XWoWfib1F11bn+isTjjy8RqaQe0GEQ3moFlvvo4kqyff HCOxLvTtmTipwEj3GZKJjykSMRoIrjhBFVe4b2W4IeKOOa0U71T/qCoY7OHnjnQp4h0h A6tv65er2Ak81RWB7I9PvDu7p7fiNbXn+pmKSMTsBBtpuDnfeSadrZqF2BuTfBLaEg2b SLcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3eqHbH93sa1EWqTau/htQx7B+mzwijmxrpRtdGlpsd7SD6BT/J OBJugDCTtcclLBCeLDHWFdQCbw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1565:b0:22c:8da7:3cf8 with SMTP id 5-20020a056000156500b0022c8da73cf8mr5643302wrz.688.1664116879959; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (91-160-61-128.subs.proxad.net. [91.160.61.128]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m10-20020a05600c3b0a00b003b47b913901sm20774761wms.1.2022.09.25.07.41.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 25 Sep 2022 07:41:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Guittot To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parth@linux.ibm.com Cc: qais.yousef@arm.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, David.Laight@aculab.com, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, tj@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org, Vincent Guittot Subject: [PATCH v5 4/7] sched/fair: Take into account latency priority at wakeup Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 16:39:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20220925143908.10846-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20220925143908.10846-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> References: <20220925143908.10846-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,PDS_BTC_ID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Take into account the latency priority of a thread when deciding to preempt the current running thread. We don't want to provide more CPU bandwidth to a thread but reorder the scheduling to run latency sensitive task first whenever possible. As long as a thread didn't use its bandwidth, it will be able to preempt the current thread. At the opposite, a thread with a low latency priority will preempt current thread at wakeup only to keep fair CPU bandwidth sharing. Otherwise it will wait for the tick to get its sched slice. curr vruntime | sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity <--> ----------------------------------|----|-----------------------|--------------- | |<---------------------> | . sysctl_sched_latency | . default/current latency entity | . | . 1111111111111111111111111111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1- se preempts curr at wakeup ------>|<- se doesn't preempt curr ----------------- | . | . | . low latency entity | . ---------------------->| % of sysctl_sched_latency | 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1- preempt ------------------------------------------------->|<- do not preempt -- | . | . | . high latency entity | . |<-----------------------| . | % of sysctl_sched_latency . 111111111|0000|-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 preempt->|<- se doesn't preempt curr ------------------------------------------ Tests results of nice latency impact on heavy load like hackbench: hackbench -l (2560 / group) -g group group latency 0 latency 19 1 1.350(+/- 1.10%) 1.287(+/- 1.60%) + 5% 4 1.392(+/- 1.67%) 1.248(+/- 1.51%) +11% 8 1.294(+/- 1.56%) 1.254(+/- 1.96%) + 3% 16 1.315(+/- 1.02%) 1.288(+/- 1.53%) + 2% hackbench -p -l (2560 / group) -g group group 1 1.768(+/- 13%) 0.805(+/- 2%) +54% 4 1.634(+/- 13%) 0.765(+/- 1%) +53% 8 1.305(+/- 4%) 0.745(+/- 2%) +43% 16 0.786(+/- 4%) 0.705(+/- 2%) +10% By deacreasing the latency prio, we reduce the number of preemption at wakeup and help hackbench making progress. Test results of nice latency impact on short live load like cyclictest while competing with heavy load like hackbench: hackbench -l 10000 -g $group & cyclictest --policy other -D 5 -q -n latency 0 latency -20 group min avg max min avg max 0 17 18 28 16 18 28 1 67 319 7369 63 76 2479 4 64 453 51699 45 95 8788 8 65 814 51699 63 116 19535 16 64 1275 37744 63 159 51134 group = 0 means that hackbench is not running. The avg is significantly improved with nice latency -20 especially with large number of groups but min and max remain quite similar. If we add the histogram parameter to get details of latency, we have : hackbench -l 10000 -g 16 & cyclictest --policy other -D 5 -q -n -H 20000 --histfile data.txt latency 0 latency -20 Min Latencies: 63 63 Avg Latencies: 1459 214 Max Latencies: 58274 82358 50% latencies: 164 87 75% latencies: 848 91 85% latencies: 1246 94 90% latencies: 2149 96 95% latencies: 8463 99 99% latencies:>20000 120 With percentile details, we see the benefit of nice latency -20 as only 1% of the latencies stays above 120us whereas the default latency has got 25% are above 848us, 10% over the 2ms and 1% above 20ms. Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot --- include/linux/sched.h | 4 +++- init/init_task.c | 2 +- kernel/sched/core.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 +- kernel/sched/fair.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- kernel/sched/sched.h | 14 ++++++++++- 6 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index 6805f378a9c3..a74cad08e91e 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -567,6 +567,8 @@ struct sched_entity { /* cached value of my_q->h_nr_running */ unsigned long runnable_weight; #endif + /* preemption offset in ns */ + long latency_offset; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* @@ -783,7 +785,7 @@ struct task_struct { int static_prio; int normal_prio; unsigned int rt_priority; - int latency_nice; + int latency_prio; struct sched_entity se; struct sched_rt_entity rt; diff --git a/init/init_task.c b/init/init_task.c index 7dd71dd2d261..b8ddf403bc62 100644 --- a/init/init_task.c +++ b/init/init_task.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct task_struct init_task .prio = MAX_PRIO - 20, .static_prio = MAX_PRIO - 20, .normal_prio = MAX_PRIO - 20, - .latency_nice = DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE, + .latency_prio = NICE_WIDTH - 20, .policy = SCHED_NORMAL, .cpus_ptr = &init_task.cpus_mask, .user_cpus_ptr = NULL, diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 6a6116ea4c2c..00fa2da12506 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1284,6 +1284,16 @@ static void set_load_weight(struct task_struct *p, bool update_load) } } +static void set_latency_offset(struct task_struct *p) +{ + long weight = sched_latency_to_weight[p->latency_prio]; + s64 offset; + + offset = sysctl_sched_latency * weight; + offset = div_s64(offset, NICE_LATENCY_WEIGHT_MAX); + p->se.latency_offset = (long)offset; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK /* * Serializes updates of utilization clamp values @@ -4559,7 +4569,9 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p) p->prio = p->normal_prio = p->static_prio; set_load_weight(p, false); - p->latency_nice = DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE; + p->latency_prio = NICE_TO_LATENCY(0); + set_latency_offset(p); + /* * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has * fulfilled its duty: @@ -7324,8 +7336,10 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p, static void __setscheduler_latency(struct task_struct *p, const struct sched_attr *attr) { - if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_LATENCY_NICE) - p->latency_nice = attr->sched_latency_nice; + if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_LATENCY_NICE) { + p->latency_prio = NICE_TO_LATENCY(attr->sched_latency_nice); + set_latency_offset(p); + } } /* @@ -7510,7 +7524,7 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP) goto change; if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_LATENCY_NICE && - attr->sched_latency_nice != p->latency_nice) + attr->sched_latency_nice != LATENCY_TO_NICE(p->latency_prio)) goto change; p->sched_reset_on_fork = reset_on_fork; @@ -8051,7 +8065,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(sched_getattr, pid_t, pid, struct sched_attr __user *, uattr, get_params(p, &kattr); kattr.sched_flags &= SCHED_FLAG_ALL; - kattr.sched_latency_nice = p->latency_nice; + kattr.sched_latency_nice = LATENCY_TO_NICE(p->latency_prio); #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK /* @@ -11204,6 +11218,20 @@ const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40] = { /* 15 */ 119304647, 148102320, 186737708, 238609294, 286331153, }; +/* + * latency weight for wakeup preemption + */ +const int sched_latency_to_weight[40] = { + /* -20 */ -1024, -973, -922, -870, -819, + /* -15 */ -768, -717, -666, -614, -563, + /* -10 */ -512, -461, -410, -358, -307, + /* -5 */ -256, -205, -154, -102, -51, + /* 0 */ 0, 51, 102, 154, 205, + /* 5 */ 256, 307, 358, 410, 461, + /* 10 */ 512, 563, 614, 666, 717, + /* 15 */ 768, 819, 870, 922, 973, +}; + void call_trace_sched_update_nr_running(struct rq *rq, int count) { trace_sched_update_nr_running_tp(rq, count); diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c index a3f7876217a6..06aaa0c81d4b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns, #endif P(policy); P(prio); - P(latency_nice); + P(latency_prio); if (task_has_dl_policy(p)) { P(dl.runtime); P(dl.deadline); diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 5ffec4370602..c3f857630dcf 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4574,6 +4574,8 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) update_idle_cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq); } +static long wakeup_latency_gran(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se); + /* * Preempt the current task with a newly woken task if needed: */ @@ -4606,6 +4608,7 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr) se = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq); delta = curr->vruntime - se->vruntime; + delta -= wakeup_latency_gran(curr, se); if (delta < 0) return; @@ -5732,6 +5735,35 @@ static int sched_idle_cpu(int cpu) } #endif +static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se); + +static void check_preempt_from_others(struct cfs_rq *cfs, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + struct sched_entity *next; + + if (se->latency_offset >= 0) + return; + + if (cfs->nr_running <= 1) + return; + /* + * When waking from another class, we don't need to check to preempt at + * wakeup and don't set next buddy as a candidate for being picked in + * priority. + * In case of simultaneous wakeup when current is another class, the + * latency sensitive tasks lost opportunity to preempt non sensitive + * tasks which woke up simultaneously. + */ + + if (cfs->next) + next = cfs->next; + else + next = __pick_first_entity(cfs); + + if (next && wakeup_preempt_entity(next, se) == 1) + set_next_buddy(se); +} + /* * The enqueue_task method is called before nr_running is * increased. Here we update the fair scheduling stats and @@ -5818,14 +5850,15 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags) if (!task_new) update_overutilized_status(rq); + if (rq->curr->sched_class != &fair_sched_class) + check_preempt_from_others(cfs_rq_of(&p->se), &p->se); + enqueue_throttle: assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq); hrtick_update(rq); } -static void set_next_buddy(struct sched_entity *se); - /* * The dequeue_task method is called before nr_running is * decreased. We remove the task from the rbtree and @@ -7144,6 +7177,22 @@ balance_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf) } #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ +static long wakeup_latency_gran(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + long latency_offset = se->latency_offset; + + /* + * A negative latency offset means that the sched_entity has latency + * requirement that needs to be evaluated versus other entity. + * Otherwise, use the latency weight to evaluate how much scheduling + * delay is acceptable by se. + */ + if ((se->latency_offset < 0) || (curr->latency_offset < 0)) + latency_offset -= curr->latency_offset; + + return latency_offset; +} + static unsigned long wakeup_gran(struct sched_entity *se) { unsigned long gran = sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity; @@ -7183,6 +7232,9 @@ wakeup_preempt_entity(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se) { s64 gran, vdiff = curr->vruntime - se->vruntime; + /* Take into account latency priority */ + vdiff -= wakeup_latency_gran(curr, se); + if (vdiff <= 0) return -1; diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index eeb6efb0b610..80c4d2f5827f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -142,6 +142,17 @@ extern int sched_rr_timeslice; * Default tasks should be treated as a task with latency_nice = 0. */ #define DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE 0 +#define DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO (DEFAULT_LATENCY_NICE + LATENCY_NICE_WIDTH/2) + +/* + * Convert user-nice values [ -20 ... 0 ... 19 ] + * to static latency [ 0..39 ], + * and back. + */ +#define NICE_TO_LATENCY(nice) ((nice) + DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO) +#define LATENCY_TO_NICE(prio) ((prio) - DEFAULT_LATENCY_PRIO) +#define NICE_LATENCY_SHIFT (SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT) +#define NICE_LATENCY_WEIGHT_MAX (1L << NICE_LATENCY_SHIFT) /* * Increase resolution of nice-level calculations for 64-bit architectures. @@ -2116,6 +2127,7 @@ static_assert(WF_TTWU == SD_BALANCE_WAKE); extern const int sched_prio_to_weight[40]; extern const u32 sched_prio_to_wmult[40]; +extern const int sched_latency_to_weight[40]; /* * {de,en}queue flags: @@ -2450,8 +2462,8 @@ extern void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags); extern const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate; extern const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_migration_cost; -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_latency; +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_min_granularity; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_idle_min_granularity; extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity; -- 2.17.1