Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <cdfe6f83-266a-de8b-d518-cc8b7fd45732@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:48:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.3.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/32] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,msm8909-tlmm: do not
 require function on non-GPIOs
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
        krishna Lanka <quic_vamslank@quicinc.com>,
        Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220924080459.13084-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <20220924080459.13084-18-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
 <YzBe5NdhGqR+2bxN@gerhold.net>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <YzBe5NdhGqR+2bxN@gerhold.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 25/09/2022 16:00, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>> +    allOf:
>> +      - $ref: "qcom,tlmm-common.yaml#/$defs/qcom-tlmm-state"
>> +      - if:
>> +          properties:
>> +            pins:
>> +              pattern: "^gpio([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|10[0-9]|11[0-7])$"
>> +        then:
>> +          required:
>> +            - function
>>  
> 
> Is it possible to place this into qcom,tlmm-common.yaml? If the pattern
> is only used to make "function" required for GPIOs, then it should not
> matter if it matches just the prefix ("^gpio") or the exact set of
> allowed GPIO numbers. The definition of the "pins" property will already
> take care of validating those.

Hm, very good idea.

> 
> Or are there some Qcom SoCs where a GPIO without "function" is valid?

Quick look at drivers says there is no such case. I can try adding it to
common schema and look for errors.


Best regards,
Krzysztof