Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753005AbXFVF3z (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:29:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751111AbXFVF3s (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:29:48 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:38662 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750881AbXFVF3r (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:29:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:31:44 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Bron Gondwana , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3? Message-Id: <20070621223144.3710362b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20070622011812.GF30132@brong.net> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 18 On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:34:24 -0300 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > You're not going to make a happy, happy merging code sharing world > > by fragmenting the licence landscape even more. > > I take it that removing barriers to cooperation in GPLv3 by default is > undesirable. Well, then, what can I say? I tried. :-( preferably that you give up. Thanks. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/