From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Organization: Boundaries Unlimited
To: Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Chinese translation of Documentation/HOWTO
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:29:51 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com,
       bryan.wu@analog.com, TripleX Chung <xxx.phy@gmail.com>,
       Maggie Chen <chenqi@beyondsoft.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
References: <1182436817579-git-send-email-leoli@freescale.com> <200706212248.34128.rob@landley.net>
In-Reply-To: <200706212248.34128.rob@landley.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200706220129.53351.rob@landley.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2561
Lines: 53

Dear Linus: you aren't at Transmeta anymore.  Here's a second attempt to cc: 
you on this because I need your opinion on a documentation issue:

On Thursday 21 June 2007 22:48:32 Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007 10:40:17 Li Yang wrote:
> > This is a Chinese translated version of Documentation/HOWTO.  Currently
> > Chinese involvement in Linux kernel is very low, especially comparing to
> > its largest population base.  Language could be the main obstacle.  Hope
> > this document will help more Chinese to contribute to Linux kernel.
>
> I'm putting together a kernel documentation directory at
> http://kernel.org/doc and I could easily add translations in there.  I just
> don't know if this is a good idea.
>
> The problem is, the submission of patches happens on the various kernel.org
> mailing lists, which are all in English.  Kernel development is done in a
> single common language: English.  (If you'd like to argue for it to be done
> in another language, please make the proposal in Linus's native Swedish.)
>
> Setting aside for the moment version skew and coverage issues when
> translating Documentation, which aren't really serious blocking issues, my
> question is this:  If developers aren't fluent enough with English to
> follow the documentation, how can they follow any of the technical
> discussions necessary to merge their patches back into the mainstream
> kernel?  Doesn't this encourage the creation of patches that can't easily
> be merged back into the kernel?
>
> It could be that the answer is "no, it's fine".  I don't feel qualified to
> make this decision.  It's very easy for me to accept contributed
> translations and put them up, but I'd like some kind of consensus from the
> kernel developers that I SHOULD do this.  How much use is a Chinese version
> of a HOWTO that tells people how to interact with an English community?
>
> Could somebody more qualified than me speak up on this one so I know what
> to do?
>
> Rob
>
> P.S.  I meant to comment when this topic first came up last week
> [http://kerneltrap.org/node/8365] but my laptop's hard drive died and I
> lost the link.  (Along with any chance of this being a particularly
> productive month for me...)


-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/