Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753409AbXFVIlY (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:41:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752981AbXFVIlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:41:09 -0400 Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:26030 "EHLO sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbXFVIlH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 04:41:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:41:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: david@lang.hm cc: Jesper Juhl , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Zolt=E1n_HUBERT?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please release a stable kernel Linux 3.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200706212349.54983.zoltan.hubert@zzaero.com> <9a8748490706211529yca0588dgd1f7e0b86f7e4a62@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 25 On Jun 21 2007 16:32, david@lang.hm wrote: >> >> For my part, I think the 2.6. did not go as well as the 2.6., >> beginning with x=16. > > you misunderstood the even/odd it was never 2.x.y with y odd/even being stable > / development, it was the x being even/odd to indicate stable / development. > > all 2.6.x are stable, all 2.5.x were development. [2.even.x stable, 2.odd.x development] True dat. But it _feels_ like 2.6.odd is becoming developmental. (The good thing however is that there's a 2.6.even quite shortly after a 2.6.odd ;-)) So basically it's like "a good kernel every 4 months". Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/