Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
To:     linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: qcom: pm8941: fix iadc node
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:05:22 +0200
Message-ID: <1828122.tdWV9SEqCh@g550jk>
In-Reply-To: <74ef3de8-5be0-70ec-e34b-717ba93d3d77@linaro.org>
References: <20220925161821.78030-1-luca@z3ntu.xyz> <20220925161821.78030-2-luca@z3ntu.xyz> <74ef3de8-5be0-70ec-e34b-717ba93d3d77@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Krzysztof,

On Montag, 26. September 2022 10:54:23 CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/09/2022 18:18, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > The iadc node name is supposed to be just 'adc' and the compatible is
> > only supposed to be qcom,spmi-iadc according to the bindings.
> > 
> > Adjust the node to match that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
> > ---
> > 
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pm8941.dtsi | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pm8941.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pm8941.dtsi index 3c15eecf2f21..33517cccee01
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pm8941.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-pm8941.dtsi
> > @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ adc-chan@48 {
> > 
> >  			};
> >  		
> >  		};
> > 
> > -		pm8941_iadc: iadc@3600 {
> > -			compatible = "qcom,pm8941-iadc", 
"qcom,spmi-iadc";
> > +		pm8941_iadc: adc@3600 {
> > +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-iadc";
> 
> I am not sure this is correct. Usually specific compatibles are encouraged.

I'm happy to change it the other way also.

But the sibling of this compatible, qcom,spmi-vadc also only has that single 
compatible so it'd align it with that.

Let me know what you think.

Regards
Luca

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof