Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp89134rwb; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:38:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6lW0FxgvRtZKKN62M6LpXrUcKk41qryK9E1VDVU/cBkioZvpPYrXmBL508T2YUC/hUbD1m X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3508:b0:451:db83:b2a7 with SMTP id b8-20020a056402350800b00451db83b2a7mr23944376edd.266.1664210316999; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664210316; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0dQum1iV5dzfMq/hMLqkSQvU8ez/Qqor5w9jZguY8oUa9+13t8Llp5AfJEegoj+m4M ylkRneRoSrpan7c+U6rVmJF1i5ON7WrvXS4a5/Vy+/3j4saw7V/iBiz1FirX0vTupF5R 0aKhvQqCTV1nhlHxPQZBaZPm1IkX40U3o/VITtDjUqXk9QXlxn8Fh56nR+Qs4CwcPoA1 AfbDF/cJDMBaRYgVjZHpv+jOOXR4v7Wdz2/L5OIMR4Kz/BPMqjo1tlP3aUhlDz4GpgP1 spZsgRMbPoIg3RRMoQJM5Y8ahLlSvXDeDr9nrG9Yz0HCisFFdPrGbMOcU/GktKaBfJwc CDxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=NeyoALofU7GpGegNrtdzct27tGQtoZg/2aXT+vQvuDg=; b=whuQhbRxP2vEgBZ7ZvGJR4gYHBUJikRZf8ydv1+GvDwGbX9LcJ7zpC/9IczK1+Yva3 cEesVkpzh1RSCIxNbdwXl9C4hT11x0k5b31Qkrxk0DxPYPuqWNN//ULbUzde2910MQur iicqGj9Tbe85niJSWoktqTAkwkDc7J4QUv5WcFzClDTe0XJskFt/xQhasxgsGj0J74ip qssm6Vt1EEi1CzE8pefjoqFs2/yukCd7969zOmowOXoEOHrsgogSjAurBXh6kcwz0xyi 2zu7URU0iA31yvJAPypBJ5CK16SmmbpwjQhKLyidNDh2jxsVF3zOm9d3RvJ5U4jtO4qA qwXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sa11-20020a1709076d0b00b00781cde43588si451171ejc.58.2022.09.26.09.37.48; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236635AbiIZPeM (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:34:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236441AbiIZPd2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 11:33:28 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:520::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163BB111E; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:20:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fw by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ocoxx-0005nw-PT; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:20:13 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:20:13 +0200 From: Florian Westphal To: Michal Hocko Cc: Florian Westphal , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vbabka@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, urezki@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Zaharinov Subject: Re: [PATCH mm] mm: fix BUG with kvzalloc+GFP_ATOMIC Message-ID: <20220926142013.GF12777@breakpoint.cc> References: <20220923133512.GE22541@breakpoint.cc> <20220926075639.GA908@breakpoint.cc> <20220926100800.GB12777@breakpoint.cc> <20220926130808.GD12777@breakpoint.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 26-09-22 15:08:08, Florian Westphal wrote: > [...] > > To the best of my knowledge there are users of this interface that > > invoke it with rcu read lock held, and since those always nest, the > > rcu_read_unlock() won't move us to GFP_KERNEL territory. > > Fiar point. I can see a comment above rhashtable_insert_fast which is > supposed to be used by drivers and explicitly documented to be > compatible with an atomic context. So the above is clearly a no-go > > In that case I would propose to go with the patch going > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/YzFplwSxwwsLpzzX@dhcp22.suse.cz direction. FWIW that patch works for me. Will you do a formal patch submission?