Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 03:35:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 03:35:27 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:781 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 03:35:14 -0500 Subject: Re: Fwd: binutils in debian unstable is broken. To: akpm@zip.com.au (Andrew Morton) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:43:39 +0000 (GMT) Cc: forming@home.com (Josh McKinney), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com (Jeff Garzik) In-Reply-To: <3C0DB3D6.9C86B865@zip.com.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Dec 04, 2001 09:42:46 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The problem appears to be that the linker is now actually doing what > we asked it to do, so the `remove_foo' entry in that table now points > at a function which isn't going to be linked into the kernel. Oh dear. The ideal it seems would be for binutils to support passing a stub function to use in such cases. That would keep the kernel stuff working nicely and allow us to do panic("__exit code called"); if anyone actually did manage to call one. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/